Is Tyson Fury really a cheat?

[removed]

Hearsay is enough "proof" in a court of law.

Ok, so why hasn't any of those names you mentioned gone to a court of law?

I'll tell you why, because they'd get laughed out the place.

[BangEM]

Ok, so why hasn't any of those names you mentioned gone to a court of law?

I'll tell you why, because they'd get laughed out the place.

They're gladiators and they would look soft going to a court of law.

Did Cotto go to a court of law to challenge Margacheato?

Anyway, I was just showing you that "hearsay" is a legal proof in a court of law and that's the proof you need.

[naranja111]

I'll debunk all of these

1. there was a hole in the thumb of Fury's glove in the Hammer fight, no evidene it was intentional

2. the floppy gloves thing was noticed by FURY HIMSELF, when he signaled to the ref in the first fight that there was something wrong with his gloves...... doesn't sound like something a cheater would do

3. ahh yes this dangerous sparring partner that Fury had to "cheat" against... the world ending Nicholas Asberry who lost to a 40 year old Malcolm Tann who was inactive for 9 years causing Ashberry to never fight again in his short and pathetic career... his "proof" of the gloves was another pair lol

4. Fury is a 6f9, 270lb man he always has power, he just never sat on his punches until he started training with Sugarhill and Kron, its not "new found power"

You are just a delusional Wilder fanboy that can't admit your boy is a complete bum that fought bums his whole career and lost, arguably twice to the only elite fighter he has ever faced

Correct and correct

[Rick Taylor]

There's a reason why he has been managed by gangsters and mobs throughout his career.

how else could this coward achieve anything in a boxing ring?

[alexguiness]

Fury is not a cheat IMO.

He is has Gypsy smarts - a different outlook and approach to life.

Same type of approach to life that Floyd had.

[BodyBagz]

In more ways than one.