Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Spence On Fighting Thurman: That Sh-t Ain't Happening; F--k Keith Thurman!

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #51
    I don't blame Spence one bit for this type of thinking. Spence wanted a crack at Thurman for years and was fighting and knocking out guys and Thurman ducked him and told him he has to wait his turn in line. I saw about 2 interviews where Thurman actually said this about Spence when questioned about a potential fight years ago. I would be angry too about that ***** happening. Now that Spence fought for the titles, won them and is now the top dog, Thurman wants to fight him. No way, I wouldn't do it. Plus Spence would end Thurman's career with his fighting style.

    What goes around, comes around. Get back in line Thurman.

    Comment


    • #52
      Never take a fight you know you can't win.
      Keith learned that much from Floyd

      Comment


      • #53
        So how many fights have you had?

        Originally posted by Nusky View Post
        Take Keith Thurman's name out of the quote and enter Crawford's- that's what this drunk pu$$y and his team are saying behind the scenes.

        If only we could get this straight of an answer out of this drunkard when it comes to the real fight everyone wants to see.

        "Some Men Down"... "Selective Strap Season"

        Someone get this fraud another round.
        You insulting a guy you watch every time he fights and you have no talent, money Or class so go sit yo a_s down clown!

        Comment


        • #54
          Originally posted by KayDub View Post
          Spence a diva, he'll stay ducking once there's a healthy Keith around.

          Of course the dude calls out Keith when he's 14-0, that's what he's supposed to do. Keith was fighting bigger names and unifying titles, why would he fight a guy who was a nobody at the time?

          Now that the fight is realistic he's going to duck it. I think a healthy Keith is his hardest test at WW.
          Lol, even you don't believe this cow dung that you just wrote.

          Comment


          • #55
            Originally posted by sicko View Post
            I still want to see it BUT I understand, Thurman did indeed try to Freeze Out Spence Jr but so did Porter and Garcia and he is fighting them back to back. Can't really complain about him fighting Crawford and Pacquiao>Thurman
            Yeah but Porter had the WBC belt and Danny Garcia is his mandatory.

            Thurman is neither of those things.

            Comment


            • #56
              Originally posted by Curtis2 View Post
              I'd pay double PPV costs to see Ugas, Ortiz or TC kick Thurman's tail
              I highly doubt Ugas could beat Thurman. Ortiz, if he can take a good shot, can possibly pull it off, TC will murder him.

              Comment


              • #57
                Originally posted by Marvlus Marv View Post
                The only name for Spence to say is Crawford. As a 'champ' he should be desperate to definitively claim to be the best WW when there are other belt-holding rivals to conquer.
                These guys are all happy being alphabet champs. It's bullshti. Time to unify.
                Tell that to Manny and his fanboys who refuse to unify despite the fight being very easy to make.

                Comment


                • #58
                  Originally posted by Doubledagger View Post
                  Yeah but Porter had the WBC belt and Danny Garcia is his mandatory.

                  Thurman is neither of those things.
                  True! Good Point! So he should indeed fight Ugas and try get that other WBA Belt away from him if he can then Challenge Spence

                  Comment


                  • #59
                    Thurman doesn’t have to pay any attention to what Spence says. If he wants this fight he should just out himself in the position to demand it. Spence doesn’t have a handle on his career like that, he’s a fighter first.

                    Comment


                    • #60
                      Originally posted by KillaMane26 View Post
                      Thurman needs to make up for his loss to PacMan.... Otherwise I don't mind Spence not fighting him.
                      This is how I see it. If Keith hadn't just lost to PacMan then Spence would probably do that fight. It doesn't behoove Spence to beat a man that just lost, and if Spence were to lose against Thurman it would destroy Spence's marketability and probably bump him out of the running to fight Crawford. I don't think Spence wants to risk his 0 if he can't take an 0 from his opponent.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP