First time I've seen her. She looks more skilled than Shields to me, and she clearly has a lot more power. I'd favour her 70-30.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Savannah Marshall Beats Down, Stops Hannah Rankin For WBO Title
Collapse
-
Originally posted by glenn mcrory View PostNotice how there isn't an american-level?
And there is a british-level?
That's because the US has pedigree.
Its always been considered the apex of the sport. People making it in the US are always considered higher level than guys named after food feasting on albanian journeymen in Fast Eddie's backyard.
Drop a best fighters of all time(even current really) list and there will probably be a total number of british fighters you could count on your hand.
Youre just not made for this kid. Watch the fights. Watch your fighters embarrass themselves. And drink yourself sh**faced into a stupor.
Just like you've always done.
Go and check the resumes of all the Brits and add them all up. Then do the same with Americans. You'll clearly see a much deeper and better resume for us even though you have 5 times our numbers. That's how pathetic you clowns are. Go and check the results between us over the last 40 years. We beat you the vast majority of the time. Check how many of your cowards ran from us so we couldn't make the wins over you even deeper. Facts don't lie. Delusional freaks like you and the rest on this cess pit of a forum do though. Every single one of your fighters is ducking at least one or more fighters out there. Your cowardice is pathological. Your delusion is pathological. You're the worlds biggest embarrassment.
Look at how many fights on average our fighters have compared to yours. And yet we have much better resumes. Your guys have about 40 fights with f3ck all on there in terms of quality. Yet we, the Europeans, and some others outside North America have fights in the 20's or less that makes a mockery of you clowns. So keep up with all the propaganda, the smoke and mirrors, and keep the world laughing at you. Just like we are with your latest freak in Wilder.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sid-Knee View PostBritish level refers to British title level you backwards idiot. Just the same with European level refers to European title level.
Go and check the resumes of all the Brits and add them all up. Then do the same with Americans. You'll clearly see a much deeper and better resume for us even though you have 5 times our numbers. That's how pathetic you clowns are. Go and check the results between us over the last 40 years. We beat you the vast majority of the time. Check how many of your cowards ran from us so we couldn't make the wins over you even deeper. Facts don't lie. Delusional freaks like you and the rest on this cess pit of a forum do though. Every single one of your fighters is ducking at least one or more fighters out there. Your cowardice is pathological. Your delusion is pathological. You're the worlds biggest embarrassment.
Look at how many fights on average our fighters have compared to yours. And yet we have much better resumes. Your guys have about 40 fights with f3ck all on there in terms of quality. Yet we, the Europeans, and some others outside North America have fights in the 20's or less that makes a mockery of you clowns. So keep up with all the propaganda, the smoke and mirrors, and keep the world laughing at you. Just like we are with your latest freak in Wilder.
Ricky Hatton is in your top 5 all time.
lol
You have no argument.
What head to head fights do you win?
Wilder Fury?
Is that it?
Your top level promoters like Hearn are known for selling out your top fighters in unwinnable fights.
Alvarez literally cleaning out his divisions of british fighters for years.
Other promoters can't even do that cause they would win the fight.
Comment
-
Originally posted by glenn mcrory View PostRicky Hatton is in your top 5 all time.
lol
You have no argument.
What head to head fights do you win?
Wilder Fury?
Is that it?
Your top level promoters like Hearn are known for selling out your top fighters in unwinnable fights.
Alvarez literally cleaning out his divisions of british fighters for years.
Other promoters can't even do that cause they would win the fight.
Lennox Lewis: Tyson, Holyfield x2, Grant, Briggs, Mercer, Morrison, McCall, Tucker and Rahamn.
Naseem Hamed: kelley and Johnson.
Nigel Benn: McClellan, Dewitt, Sims, Williams and barkley.
Tyson Fury: x2 Wilder.
AJ: Ruiz.
Josh Taylor: Prograis.
Joe Calzaghe: Lacy, Hopkins, Jones, Mitchell, Brewer and Shieka.
Carl Froch: Taylor and Dirrell.
Kell Brook: Porter.
Ricky Hatton: Collazo, Philips and Malignaggi.
Amir Khan: Judah, Alexander and Malinaggi.
James Degale: Dirrell.
Paul Ingle: Jr Jones.
That's 38 wins over you in the last 40 years. There's more, but that will do you for now until you can match it. Then i'll continue to put you firmly in your place like i do with every other idiot from your backwards asylum of a country.
We'll just stick to the one topic for now otherwise you'll deflect like the other loons too. Once i'm finished on this, then i'll get to your laughable comments on Canelo supposedly "Cleaning us out". Haha.
Comment
-
Originally posted by glenn mcrory View PostRicky Hatton is in your top 5 all time.
lol
You have no argument.
What head to head fights do you win?
Wilder Fury?
Is that it?
Your top level promoters like Hearn are known for selling out your top fighters in unwinnable fights.
Alvarez literally cleaning out his divisions of british fighters for years.
Other promoters can't even do that cause they would win the fight.
Your delusional ways do get you into trouble beyond your capabilities don't they?
I'm pissing on the US and the Mexican flag.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sid-Knee View PostHave you ran away like a typical American coward after puffing out your chest and talking typical nonsense?
Your delusional ways do get you into trouble beyond your capabilities don't they?
I'm pissing on the US and the Mexican flag.
I dont stand all day in front of a computer checking to see who insults the queens grace.
lol
Thanks for putting it into context.
Jesus some of those wins are *****ing terrible.
How can you he proud of posting those wins on Hatton and Hamed?
You literally put DeGale for beating Dirrell?
Why even post that?
Those wins would get those ranked#10000000 all time on an american list.
Comment
-
Originally posted by glenn mcrory View Postlol
I dont stand all day in front of a computer checking to see who insults the queens grace.
lol
Thanks for putting it into context.
Jesus some of those wins are *****ing terrible.
How can you he proud of posting those wins on Hatton and Hamed?
You literally put DeGale for beating Dirrell?
Why even post that?
Those wins would get those ranked#10000000 all time on an american list.
I listed all the good world class wins or better over you from the past 40 years. You're supposed to list all the good world class wins or better over the same period you have over us. But you did what i predicted you would do, because every other moron like you did the same after mouthing off. And this after saying Fury over Wilder was all we had. Haha. Dipshlt.
Tom "Boom boom" Johnson was a very good fighter, and Kelley was a good world class fighter. What are you talking about you clown?
The wins for Hatton are the same. Tell me why they weren't good world class wins, and i'll educate you again.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sid-Knee View PostThe deflection tactic and refusing to answer because you haven't got anything. Haven't seen this one before. haha.
I listed all the good world class wins or better over you from the past 40 years. You're supposed to list all the good world class wins or better over the same period you have over us. But you did what i predicted you would do, because every other moron like you did the same after mouthing off. And this after saying Fury over Wilder was all we had. Haha. Dipshlt.
Tom "Boom boom" Johnson was a very good fighter, and Kelley was a good world class fighter. What are you talking about you clown?
The wins for Hatton are the same. Tell me why they weren't good world class wins, and i'll educate you again.
Because there arent any.
Literally Spence and Ruiz starching Brook and Joshua is like half of your top 5.
Ruiz is a huge undisciplined fat ass lol
Trying to think of more but I wouldnt call them elite.
Is Khan considered a good win for people? lol
Youre a joke.
No other country could have two of their best leveled just like that.
No. Those aren't good wins.
Beating any of the Barrera, Morales , Marquez trio would have been great wins, and would make him what you say he was.
He picked the weakest link, got his ass kicked, embarrassed and retired. Essentially conceding he had no place at that level.
Hatton hid his level fighting the two best fighters so people could say he only lost to the best.
Too bad people saw Collazo almost stop him and Senchenko retire him in disgrace.
That was his actual level.
So the guys he did beat were clearly ass.
Best win is Paulie I guess lol
Comment
-
Originally posted by glenn mcrory View PostGood or better world class wins over british fighters dont exist.
Because there arent any.
Literally Spence and Ruiz starching Brook and Joshua is like half of your top 5.
Ruiz is a huge undisciplined fat ass lol
Trying to think of more but I wouldnt call them elite.
Is Khan considered a good win for people? lol
Youre a joke.
No other country could have two of their best leveled just like that.
No. Those aren't good wins.
Beating any of the Barrera, Morales , Marquez trio would have been great wins, and would make him what you say he was.
He picked the weakest link, got his ass kicked, embarrassed and retired. Essentially conceding he had no place at that level.
Hatton hid his level fighting the two best fighters so people could say he only lost to the best.
Too bad people saw Collazo almost stop him and Senchenko retire him in disgrace.
That was his actual level.
So the guys he did beat were clearly ass.
Best win is Paulie I guess lol
And there was you boasting about Canelo "Cleaning us out" even though there wasn't a single good win there against shot or smaller fighters. But when it came to Smith and Saunders, your coward wanted nothing to do with them. Only when they had a bad performance last time out did the joke come sniffing around. I mean, you haven't even got the decency to be ashamed of this cheat and embarrassment. Draining fighters who are already in a bad place or are plain not world class. What a disgrace.
Brook was a broken man after having the eye injury and having to drain back down after putting muscle weight on. He was already struggling with the weight before he moved up. So that meant nothing.
AJ made the mistake in trying to take Ruiz out when he got back up by swinging with a hooker who is shorter than him and has faster hands. Fighters AJ's size don't do that for that very reason. It's a big no no. AJ however identified the problem and got to work in the rematch and dominated to get his titles back. Many fighters have gone through similar situations when the big favourite. It happens. Especially in the Heavyweight division.
No other country could have two of their best levelled like that? Even though Brook was damaged goods? You really are as dense in the head as you appear to be... F3ck me are you people an abomination.
Jones by Johnson. Hearns by Barkley. Louis by a shot Shmelling. Americans have been getting knocked out throughout history. For you to think otherwise shows how backwards you are. Recently, prime Americans have been beaten badly by shot fighters in Thurman against Manny, Browne by Pascal, Charlo by Korobov etc etc.. That's how embarrassing you are. Wilder has just been lit up by Fury and he isn't even a puncher. Then you've got these robberies like Ramirez over Postal and Zepeda, Porter over Ugas, Wilder over Fury 1, The Charlo's i've lost count, Canelo's whole career basically, Spence over Porter, Danny G's whole career practically etc etc.. Just sit down you complete mong.
"Boom Boom" wasn't a very good fighter? You don't even know who he is. You weren't even watching boxing back then. Clearly. He was making the 14th defence of his title when he unified against Naz. Kelley had only one loss and was a former world champ. It was the biggest fight of that year in 97. Just stop this madness you weirdo. Start acting normal and like a rational person.
Actually, Barrera got Naz at the perfect time when he wasn't at his best any more. His style had been messed with too much by Steward and Oscar that didn't suit him, and he had fallen in love with his power so was loading up with big single shots. Before that though, Naz was trying to get Morales, Barrera and Marquez into the ring but they ducked for years. It was only after Barrera was robbed of the decision against Morales did he think he had nothing to lose so took the fight. The rest is history. But it's good to know the context of the time which you clearly don't. All fighters resumes are mostly filled with good fighters. That's how they become great by beating many of them. It's not just filled with ATG's you idiot. How would anybody become great if good wins meant nothing? Duh.
Hatton's beat wins are Kostya Tzsyu and Jose Luis castillo you complete moron. Clearly you don't know what you're talking about. Get off the forum kid because you're embarrassing yourself like i said you would.
Senchenko came after being retired for years and completely shot. I suppose Ali found his true level against Spinks and Berbick? Tyson against Williams and McBride? Robinson against Hernandez and Harrington? You absolute joke.
So any fighter that has a tough round like Hatton did against Collazo, the bigger man, is a joke? Do you know how many Mexicans and Americans i could name who went through the same thing in some of their wins? Practically every one of them. But you're a legit f3cking mong as we can see so it's no surprise you even write such madness down.
I would love to meet intelligent Americans and Mexicans who know about the subject they appear to follow. But they don't exist. Just crazy delusional ****** families is all you have. What a shlt country you have.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sid-Knee View PostYeah, you're right, there's no world class fighters from the UK at all. Sigh. You're a clown who can't back yourself after mouthing off so have to write more madness to deflect. Too scared to try and have a normal discussion and back your pathetic words because you only have a handful of wins of merit over the last 40 years. It's been domination from us. And that doesn't include all the cowards you have an abundance of so duck many fights otherwise our win column would be much bigger than it is now.
And there was you boasting about Canelo "Cleaning us out" even though there wasn't a single good win there against shot or smaller fighters. But when it came to Smith and Saunders, your coward wanted nothing to do with them. Only when they had a bad performance last time out did the joke come sniffing around. I mean, you haven't even got the decency to be ashamed of this cheat and embarrassment. Draining fighters who are already in a bad place or are plain not world class. What a disgrace.
Brook was a broken man after having the eye injury and having to drain back down after putting muscle weight on. He was already struggling with the weight before he moved up. So that meant nothing.
AJ made the mistake in trying to take Ruiz out when he got back up by swinging with a hooker who is shorter than him and has faster hands. Fighters AJ's size don't do that for that very reason. It's a big no no. AJ however identified the problem and got to work in the rematch and dominated to get his titles back. Many fighters have gone through similar situations when the big favourite. It happens. Especially in the Heavyweight division.
No other country could have two of their best levelled like that? Even though Brook was damaged goods? You really are as dense in the head as you appear to be... F3ck me are you people an abomination.
Jones by Johnson. Hearns by Barkley. Louis by a shot Shmelling. Americans have been getting knocked out throughout history. For you to think otherwise shows how backwards you are. Recently, prime Americans have been beaten badly by shot fighters in Thurman against Manny, Browne by Pascal, Charlo by Korobov etc etc.. That's how embarrassing you are. Wilder has just been lit up by Fury and he isn't even a puncher. Then you've got these robberies like Ramirez over Postal and Zepeda, Porter over Ugas, Wilder over Fury 1, The Charlo's i've lost count, Canelo's whole career basically, Spence over Porter, Danny G's whole career practically etc etc.. Just sit down you complete mong.
"Boom Boom" wasn't a very good fighter? You don't even know who he is. You weren't even watching boxing back then. Clearly. He was making the 14th defence of his title when he unified against Naz. Kelley had only one loss and was a former world champ. It was the biggest fight of that year in 97. Just stop this madness you weirdo. Start acting normal and like a rational person.
Actually, Barrera got Naz at the perfect time when he wasn't at his best any more. His style had been messed with too much by Steward and Oscar that didn't suit him, and he had fallen in love with his power so was loading up with big single shots. Before that though, Naz was trying to get Morales, Barrera and Marquez into the ring but they ducked for years. It was only after Barrera was robbed of the decision against Morales did he think he had nothing to lose so took the fight. The rest is history. But it's good to know the context of the time which you clearly don't. All fighters resumes are mostly filled with good fighters. That's how they become great by beating many of them. It's not just filled with ATG's you idiot. How would anybody become great if good wins meant nothing? Duh.
Hatton's beat wins are Kostya Tzsyu and Jose Luis castillo you complete moron. Clearly you don't know what you're talking about. Get off the forum kid because you're embarrassing yourself like i said you would.
Senchenko came after being retired for years and completely shot. I suppose Ali found his true level against Spinks and Berbick? Tyson against Williams and McBride? Robinson against Hernandez and Harrington? You absolute joke.
So any fighter that has a tough round like Hatton did against Collazo, the bigger man, is a joke? Do you know how many Mexicans and Americans i could name who went through the same thing in some of their wins? Practically every one of them. But you're a legit f3cking mong as we can see so it's no surprise you even write such madness down.
I would love to meet intelligent Americans and Mexicans who know about the subject they appear to follow. But they don't exist. Just crazy delusional ****** families is all you have. What a shlt country you have.
You pretty much made an excuse for every loss to half relevant fighters.
Yes all your fighters were old shot and smaller.
lol
There is no british fighter Canelo would ever lose to, lol he aint ducking anyone from that s**thole lol
Callum Smith and Billy Joe Saunders lol
Is that all your s**t country has to offer lol
He’ll wreck both on the same night.
Losing to old shot fighters maybe, at least not losing to british guys.
Probably because even in their prime theyre still worse than old shot guys.
Yes, Hamed was ducked.
lol
And not you know, what most fighters do, feast on Britain’s best.
You notice guys like Crawford and Lomachenko dont travel and fight against locals because of the extra dangers that presents but they will go to the lions den in the uk.
Because they know the fights will be so one sided no way they lose even in the uk. A country for their s**tty decisions and robberies.
Ironically, Kelley got stopped by both Barrera and Morales in non-competitive fights so like I said, him and Hamed were not elite, they both fought elite fighters in Barrera and Morales and got battered.
Back to UK level they go.
Comment
Comment