If Usyk loses is Eastern Euro Dominance over?

[The plunger man]

I would not say dominance...they have produced some wold class fighters but like everything life it go’s in cycles....I don’t believe Usyk will evolve into a heavyweight great like Holyfield did...Usyk is highly skilled but he has a lot to prove as a heavyweight and chisora is the kind of heavyweight that can make Usyk look amazing because he has one gear and is pretty slow for a heavyweight....let’s see tonight

[The plunger man]

Why such hate for good champion Eastern Europeans and who in the hell do you want to dominate boxing anyway???? GGG beat Canelo twice and got Vegas robbed twice and refused a third fight. GGG is still a world champion. No matter how Usyk does at heavyweight he proved himself to be the best cruiserweight in the world. Beterbiev and Bivol are by far the best at 175 and Bivol could drop to 168 and beat everyone there too.The best Eastern European boxers are as good as ever and that is pretty damn good so get used to it or not.I am an American boxing fan with no ties to eastern Europe. i just know if I think a boxer is good no matter where he comes from.

so true if your a great fighter it don’t matter where your from..that’s a boxing fan 100% ..green k fella

[MUNG]

domination is facing all comer's and winning clearly and cleanly - boxing is not even setup to allow this with corrupt official's, a-side's, different side's of the street, marination, promoter rivalries etc

[Mushroom]

UK dominates boxing. Tyson Fury is the best fighter in all of boxing. He could beat everyone else on the P4P list on the same night. The rest of the champions are basically part of a boxing Paralympics for men that haven’t grown enough to fight a good sized man.

So if anything we dominate boxing

[boliodogs]

[QUOTE=stealthradon;20848939]Not part of Eastern Europe:
Kazakhstan.
Russia.

Usyk was born on Crimea. It was under Russian control at the time.

And so was Bilhorod-Dnistrovskyi at the time of Loma's birth.

So actually none of them good be considered Eastern European.[/QUOTE You are correct but the thread starter thinks they are and many others do as well so let's just say from that part of the world for this thread.

[kidbazooka]

Eastern Europeans have never ever dominated professional boxing.

They are doing well, and competitive 'But dominance? No'.

Italians, Irish, African America's and blacks in general are pretty much the only demographics that have dominated the sport of boxing.

Note: Eastern European's and Ireland seem to kind of had the same level of success 'I would not put Ireland on the same level of Italian American fighters or African American-Black fighters universally 'In terms of pure historical success'.

But even still? Ireland probably continually in mass produces more top quality fighters than Eastern Europe.

Eastern European fighters are doing well, and they will continue to do well 'I have just never really seen any dominance from them'.

Lol wtf itlanian Irish didn’t run ****ttt lol

Hispanics run the sport the best boxer p4p is Mexican the 2nd best boxer p4p is Hispanic too that’s why all these other fighters of different race love to play up to the Mexican base.

Ggg “Mexican style”
Floyd “Mexican attire”
Fury “Mexican gloves robs”

All these nobodies have to play up to the Mexican fans. FACTS!!!!!!

Get the facts straight son!!!!!

As for EE Hahahahahahahaha they ain’t never domabted squat.

[Guest]

****** thread.

[LoadedWraps]

****** thread.

That and clear bait and flame thread.

Closed.