Comments Thread For: Miguel Vazquez Reflects on Controversial Loss, Aims For World Title Run

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BIGPOPPAPUMP
    Franchise Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Sep 2003
    • 46539
    • 2,259
    • 334
    • 5,493,285

    #1

    Comments Thread For: Miguel Vazquez Reflects on Controversial Loss, Aims For World Title Run

    "I felt I won the fight but I had to accept the result," said a remarkably positive Miguel Vazquez just a couple of weeks after he lost one of the year's more hotly-disputed decisions. The Mexican lost a split verdict to Lewis Ritson in Peterborough on October 17, his second controversial defeat in the UK following a points defeat to Ohara Davies last year.
    [Click Here To Read More]
  • tokon
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Feb 2009
    • 7675
    • 1,846
    • 1,349
    • 42,234

    #2
    The judges for the ritson fight should have been called before the board to explain their scoring. None of them were close, the decision was (another) blatant Hearn funded robbery.

    Comment

    • fistic flow
      Interim Champion
      Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
      • Dec 2010
      • 604
      • 148
      • 165
      • 15,871

      #3
      Originally posted by tokon
      The judges for the ritson fight should have been called before the board to explain their scoring. None of them were close, the decision was (another) blatant Hearn funded robbery.
      Hearn called the decision a robbery, and the BBBofC pick the judges, so I don't know what you're talking about. It's a problem in general that house fighters of the top promoters get favoured, be that with Warren (Davies/Vazquez), Goldenboy or whoever. The judges should be held to account via the boards or commissions that use them, especially when their inconsistencies are repeated.

      Comment

      • anonymous2.0
        Undisputed Champion
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Jan 2012
        • 11177
        • 1,871
        • 7
        • 75,058

        #4
        Originally posted by tokon
        The judges for the ritson fight should have been called before the board to explain their scoring. None of them were close, the decision was (another) blatant Hearn funded robbery.
        IIRC one judge was but was cleared of any wrong doings, forget his name one of the UK posters will tell you. Terry somethingorother.

        Comment

        • tokon
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Feb 2009
          • 7675
          • 1,846
          • 1,349
          • 42,234

          #5
          Originally posted by fistic flow
          Hearn called the decision a robbery, and the BBBofC pick the judges, so I don't know what you're talking about. It's a problem in general that house fighters of the top promoters get favoured, be that with Warren (Davies/Vazquez), Goldenboy or whoever. The judges should be held to account via the boards or commissions that use them, especially when their inconsistencies are repeated.
          Yes, it's definitely a matter for the governing athletic boards. Thanks.

          Comment

          • komandante
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Jul 2008
            • 3579
            • 184
            • 14
            • 24,294

            #6
            He' a real Mexican champ unlike JMM, Nery who I think are cheats.

            Comment

            Working...
            TOP