Comments Thread For: Teofimo Lopez Sr: Judge Who Had It 119-109 For My Son Had The Best Score

[BoZz]

He's right we need more fair and honest judges like that, I honestly couldn't see how anyone could give loma even one single round. The reason some think he won 2 or 3 rounds is because he threw a punch or two unlike in the first 8 rounds he was just copping it, and even when he landed something lopez fought back straight away. And I think another reason could be because of the fkn commentators, they were having an ****** every time loma threw something made you fkn think he was winning the fight but when lopez fought back there was nothing to be heard. So yea the judge deserves a medal for being an honest c*nt

[Silver Spear]

Absolutely agree. People on here just hate on Loma so much that they will say absolutely anything to discredit champ. I mean Loma didn't have his best fight but he clearly took 6-12 rounds plus 2 round. I don't know why people on here morons. The scorecards were rigged it is obvious!

I still regard Loma the best in boxing right now but I would have a hard time proving a draw at best. Loma gave away too many early rounds simply by being too defensive and not throwing anything. He should have resorted to his amateur days where scoring is much easier to do. Lopez pulled a mayweather and won early rounds simply for being more active even though he never landed anything meaningful.

If you look at who dominated who it was clear that Loma had the more dominating moments and Lopez had no answer to Loma once he showed us his true self. The problem was that Loma forgot that you score each round definitively and not the entire fight collectively. The only round where I believe Lopez looked good was the last round where he let it all go but he needed help, he needed a Loma also willing to trade and get in there and get hit.

In the end I think the judges were swayed just like Bradley by all the punches Lopez was throwing and appeared to land but if you watched on replay they were either blocked by Loma or parried.

[Silver Spear]

He's right we need more fair and honest judges like that, I honestly couldn't see how anyone could give loma even one single round. The reason some think he won 2 or 3 rounds is because he threw a punch or two unlike in the first 8 rounds he was just copping it, and even when he landed something lopez fought back straight away. And I think another reason could be because of the fkn commentators, they were having an ****** every time loma threw something made you fkn think he was winning the fight but when lopez fought back there was nothing to be heard. So yea the judge deserves a medal for being an honest c*nt

Is this opposite day?

[Rick Taylor]

I agree with him

Here's some food for thought. I'm not going to try even a little bit to change your mind about the fight. I'm just going to explain myself a little.

You won't see me early in any Loma-Lopez discussions.

You won't find me in very many Loma threads prior to this fight period.

You won't find me in very many lower weight class threads either.

I picked up interest in this fight as the subject of undisputed gained traction. The only other lower-class threads you may see me in are Josh-Jose on the next level up and that too started when i realized undisputed might be taking place.

I do not give a **** about bobble head title holders. You must be undisputed for me to give a ****. I used to give a **** but I already did the Pac/May thing. Multi division single strap is okay, I want to see some undisputed champions though.

Okay, if that's not enough to show you I really had no vested interest peak my Mystic Predictions thread and then the Pick'em thread. Not only did I use playing cards to predict the outcome, I bet on it.

I do not give a **** about these fighters, I don't even give a **** about getting credit for a prediction. (Late KO BTW so all I got right was Lopez), Even if it had come up perfect for me I had already positioned myself in a stance where I can't give myself any credit for knowing anything because I openly admitted I don't watch these little ****s, and, I played a game like spinning a ****ing bottle to pick the winner.

I don't think most of you can boast the same. I'm pretty sure if I look at the "Loma won" or "Loma did well doe" boys I'd find some nice posting history indicating y'all mother ****ers not only were invested in your side but have been for a while now.

I'm sure plenty of Lopez's "fans" are just haters riding a wave, and I'm sure it's annoying, but, you don't need to be a Loma hater or a Lopez fan to know Lopez kicked that ass. I had no vested interest at all and I come off like a stark Loma hater because what I saw was a straight up one sided ass whooping. I'm pretty sure I wasn't bias for or against. I'm pretty sure a lot of you were and are.

Me, Teo the Elder, and Julie got one finger for y'all.

YDKSAB you bum

[Marchegiano]

YDKSAB you bum

You have any posts of actual worth or just a new/alt with opinions you think make you a worth a **** member of this community.

[BaguMka]

I still regard Loma the best in boxing right now but I would have a hard time proving a draw at best. Loma gave away too many early rounds simply by being too defensive and not throwing anything. He should have resorted to his amateur days where scoring is much easier to do. Lopez pulled a mayweather and won early rounds simply for being more active even though he never landed anything meaningful.

If you look at who dominated who it was clear that Loma had the more dominating moments and Lopez had no answer to Loma once he showed us his true self. The problem was that Loma forgot that you score each round definitively and not the entire fight collectively. The only round where I believe Lopez looked good was the last round where he let it all go but he needed help, he needed a Loma also willing to trade and get in there and get hit.

In the end I think the judges were swayed just like Bradley by all the punches Lopez was throwing and appeared to land but if you watched on replay they were either blocked by Loma or parried.

Great analysis , agree with u

[Rick Taylor]

You have any posts of actual worth

do you? or are you just always a pompous clown? (who DKSAB)

[Marchegiano]

do you?

yes.

or are you just always a pompous clown?

Only when dealing with *******s who think their opinions are super important and some how proof of their knowledge.

(who DKSAB)

Cute

When you come up with something more academic than asking us in the history section to teach you some history then maybe I'll start to respect your "knowledge" but until then you're just a self important noob with a big mouth to me.

[Silver Spear]

yes.



Only when dealing with *******s who think their opinions are super important and some how proof of their knowledge.



Cute

When you come up with something more academic than asking us in the history section to teach you some history then maybe I'll start to respect your "knowledge" but until then you're just a self important noob with a big mouth to me.

Ignore the troll. His next post will say something like living in your head rent free. He clearly seeks attention. He never has anything of substance to say.

[Walexhris]

lol

This is laughable