-
-
Just my opinion, but his, IMO, overdramatic, ridiculous looking twitching from a punch where, IMO, nothing but soft padding and handwraps slid off the side of slippery, vasaline-drenched face, where there was IMO zero direct contact and zero contact at all except for padding, is what made me think the Menard KO was even more fake than it already looked.
I mean, how can you have a KO without a punch landing? And by punch I mean fist, or at least some hard part of the hand. But just padding? Sliding off the slippery cheek? No.
Plus, pretty much everyone agrees, Wilder vs Scott was fake. So if the USA heavyweight champ, who met the President, is in fake fights, what makes you think any other fight is real? Wilder has already, according to most people, been caught in a fake fight. Then vs Fury, Fury gets up right at the count of 10? What are the odds! So you know the guy is already in fake fights, and then a fight happens that is so theatrical and unbelievable and low probability, it would have been a hit even in WWE, and you're not going to suspect that it's fake too? And if you slow down the footage, IMO, you can see exactly how they did it too. Wilder pulls the first right hand in and low right after the glove hits Fury's chin, and with the left hand he slaps it out and high so that it only slaps and scuffs the high part of Fury's head.
IMO, two fake punches, but using two opposing techniques, at opposite spectrums, to fake the punches, so that in the moment, at full speed, the viewer can't compute what they saw, and it all blends together. They think, "That punch looked a little below the target, and that one looked a little above the target, but if you average it out, that would be right on target." IMO it's designed to trick the subconscious mind of the viewer in that way.Comment
-
Lol bro don't be ridiculous. Did I say anything like that? I just meant it's typical of this culture of misinformation in the world. Although yeah, based on what Edward Snowden exposed, probably everything both of us write is being collected in some database somewhere. But do I think there are actual like undercover internet "Agents" as you said responding to my posts, lol, no. Maybe some bots are set up to do that in general, but not me specifically. My posts are just a drop in the bucket, and I'm basically a peaceful, non-rebellious citizen, where my only anti-establishment posts, if you can even call them that, relate to the subject of boxing, and my being frustrated about how, IMO, fake Boxing turned out to be, and how, IMO, badly fooled I was.
Like, my whole life, I've tried to be an honest person. It always hurt whenever I was lied to, and I didn't want to do that to other people. Lies are hurtful, basically. And IMO, a lot of Boxing turned out to be a lie, so now that I believe that, events like this featuring my former favorite boxers, before I, IMO, knew better, serve as sort of "triggering" events where I end up coming back to the forums to vent. But like I said it's a drop in the bucket of posts, so I doubt anyone really cares. And if I thought they did, I would stop doing it completely because helping 2 or 3 other people realize the, IMO, truth, so that they no longer get, IMO, fooled the way I, IMO, was, for so long, is not worth pissing off anyone powerful. But seriously, I don't think they care. I just think comments like yours are symptomatic of a culture full of, IMO, lies.Comment
Tweet
Comment