What's your pick and why?
Better win: Floyd vs JMM? Or Lomachenko vs Rigondeaux?
Collapse
-
Better win: Floyd vs JMM? Or Lomachenko vs Rigondeaux?
60Floyd vs Juan Manuel Marquez was the better win.46.67%28Lomachenko vs Rigondeaux was the better win.53.33%32Tags: None -
-
Floyd vs jmm was a joke of a fight. Another joke on mayweather’s list of jokes to the boxing worldComment
-
-
My opinion is that Lomachenko's over Rigondeaux was the better win. My reasons are, Rigondeaux was a 2 time Olympic Champ, with a 475-12 win-loss record. Although 2 inches shorter he had a 3-4 in reach advantage. He was the 122lb champ with no better fighter in sight. This was his first loss for 15 years. He landed FIFTEEN punches in total over 6 rounds that's 2/12 punches a round. Was completely outclassed.
Marquez was a jumped up featherweight, going up to lightweight only to fight Casamayor and Diaz. Mayweather was an unbeaten 4 div champion, with a 5" reach advantage, as well as being the much bigger man, used to fighting welterweights and up.
He broke the agreed weight limit. .Comment
-
-
-
-
Floyd's win, as he was coming out of a 2 year layoff, and Marquez had two good wins against Casamayor and Juan Diaz.
Loma was fighting every 4 months at that time so he didn't have any ring rust.Comment
Comment