5 days until Revelated is off this forum.
Collapse
-
-
I think you don't understand what the bet is. Plus the points bet, he wants you to **** openly on Crawford, if Loma wins. I don't even think it's about loser leaves NSB. It's all confusing.
Loma isn't fighting Crawford. I don't know what the members here are not getting. This is not a bet on Loma-Lopez.
It's quite illogical.
Otherwise, I would have bet him. I'm the one who suggested points to him. Then he said I must say some **** about Crawford as well if Lopez loses. I disconnected there.Last edited by BoxingIsGreat; 10-13-2020, 05:40 PM.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
You sir are a master at twisting the facts.I think you don't understand what the bet is. Plus the points bet, he wants you to **** openly on Crawford, if Loma wins. I don't even think it's about loser leaves NSB. It's all confusing.
Loma isn't fighting Crawford. I don't know what the members here are not getting. This is not a bet on Loma-Lopez.
It's quite illogical.
Otherwise, I would have bet him. I'm the one who suggested points to him. Then he said I must say some **** about Crawford as well if Lopez loses. I disconnected there.
I put up there for over a week the Loser Leaves BoxingScene.
It was YOU who said that bet didn't make any sense. Thus my change.
But "AT THE END OF THE DAY", you vociferous Lopez fans ducked that bet.
So I need something. What better than your ego?
Someone who is so head-over-the-moon about Terence Crawford is a perfect mark to take that and embarrass you by having you openly denounce him.
Why?
Because it's the perfect way to serve you humble pie after your guy loses the fight on the 17th.Comment
-
"no good reason".I don't believe it. That is too good to be true. The guy put me on ignore from day one for no good reason and he starts more threads than anyone but AL Broker so I can't participate in so many threads. I don't like his opinions in most cases and think the board is better off without him clogging up the board with lousy threads.
I already listed the only way people get on ignore. You violated one - chances are, you were overly defensive about Golovkin. And...
Ultimately, I gave all of you a free pass to get rid of me - legit. None of you accepted the bet. The REAL bet. You all ducked it. SO be itComment
-
When I asked you what your weird negative obsession with Crawford was, you put me on ignore. You're going to win this bet but you're still a d bag."no good reason".
I already listed the only way people get on ignore. You violated one - chances are, you were overly defensive about Golovkin. And...
Ultimately, I gave all of you a free pass to get rid of me - legit. None of you accepted the bet. The REAL bet. You all ducked it. SO be itComment
-
So basically, you don't like the truth, either. Because everything I've ever said about Crawford is nothing but truth tea.
You may not like it, doesn't make it a lie.
He DUCKED Porter on DAZN.
He lowballed Swift, then gave Khan twice the money and low blowed him.
His manager called Kavaliauskas a C-level fighter; Kav proceeded to two-piece, wobble and drop Crawford.
His manager called Kell Brook a "Wounded Duck" and said that fight wouldn't happen. Here we are.
None of that is false. I challenge you to point out any falsehood in ANY of that.Comment
-
You were posting weird negative shyte about Crawford long before any of this came to pass. Rumor has it you're butthurt over him destroying Horn. True? And why put me on ignore for just asking the question?So basically, you don't like the truth, either. Because everything I've ever said about Crawford is nothing but truth tea.
You may not like it, doesn't make it a lie.
He DUCKED Porter on DAZN.
He lowballed Swift, then gave Khan twice the money and low blowed him.
His manager called Kavaliauskas a C-level fighter; Kav proceeded to two-piece, wobble and drop Crawford.
His manager called Kell Brook a "Wounded Duck" and said that fight wouldn't happen. Here we are.
None of that is false. I challenge you to point out any falsehood in ANY of that.Comment
Comment