Compare 118-110 in CaneloGGG1 to Charlo Derevyanchenko

[Thuglife Nelo]

Because of one card, a narrative was created to discredit Canelo Alvarez. Compare the compubox and technique from both fights, styles. From the four fighters, one decided to JUST throw jabs all night with most of them missing...

The lesson learned is PREFERENCE from technique. Do you go with the defending Champ doing very little just to get by, accept the closer cards from both fights and the other judges?

Canelo GGG 1 was a draw but the GGg fans cried it was a robbery.

The Charlo Derevyanchenko was a good fight, close, but one card makes it a robbery? If Byrd had Canelo winning 115-113 the result would’ve been the same and the narrative would be different.

[_Rexy_]

They’re both ludicrous scorecards. Not even gonna bother to read your post.

[Thuglife Nelo]

They’re both ludicrous scorecards. Not even gonna bother to read your post.

You said Derevyanchenko edged it by a round. Many fans still say GGG beat Canelo in the second fight but “a draw would’ve been fine.” Lol “fine.” Those comments are simply because they don’t want to acknowledge Canelo’s ability to win.

Also Steve Weisfeld had Canelo beating GGG 115-113. He had Derevyanchenko losing to Jermall 117-111.

How did you score the Canelo GGG rematch?

[daggum]

didnt like 80 percent of the people score it for ggg? how does that change? didnt most of press row score it for ggg? how does that change? in fact byrd's card was so ridiculous its not even brought up that often because no one takes it seriously. people usually just bring up that it was a bad decision. that narrative was ggg won. i dont see how that changes with byrd having a different card. peoples cards dont also change along with hers.