Why do posters only complain about scoring and compubox

[Larry the boss]

When A fighter they support loses or when a boxer they dislikes wins?? They have no complaints when their fighters win close fights but if they lose a close fight it is all the sudden a robbery or compubox is wrong...how hard is it to just get credit where it is due?

[daggum]

give credit to compubox when its wrong? why?

[Luilun]

Are you aware how hard a fighter works only to get robbed ? well it's not a nice feeling got robbed twice as an amateur. First time that happens I was pissed second time I was like F this sport. Believe me when you fight you know when you clearly lost or won thats why Floyd gave Castillo and Madaina rematches he knows he lost

[blowblow]

because compubox is never accurate. and the judges lost their sights due to money in front of them.. that's how boxing works now unless you k.o clean your opponents.

[daggum]

because compubox is never accurate. and the judges lost their sights due to money in front of them.. that's how boxing works now unless you k.o clean your opponents.

its super accurate just find the 11 power punches floyd landed on pac in round 3. can you find even one is a better test. i mean maybe you can find one...the camera does kind of block what happens at one point so maybe it lands? getting from one to 11 when every other punch clearly misses or is blocked is kind of laughable. then watching larry come on here and tout these numbers as proof that floyd won is doubly laughable. where are the punches in reality? oh they are on a piece of paper thats says they happened...cept htey didnt

[blowblow]

its super accurate just find the 11 power punches floyd landed on pac in round 3. can you find even one is a better test. i mean maybe you can find one...the camera does kind of block what happens at one point so maybe it lands? getting from one to 11 when every other punch clearly misses or is blocked is kind of laughable. then watching larry come on here and tout these numbers as proof that floyd won is doubly laughable. where are the punches in reality? oh they are on a piece of paper thats says they happened...cept htey didnt

that's why i said it's NEVER accurate my friend.

[Boxing-1013]

I didn't give 2 s,hits about who won between Manny and Horn. But I thought those stats were way off. I thought Bika and Ward's numbers were way off. I thought the fight last night with Charlo and SD were way off. None of those guys are 'my guys' and the only one I can say I don't like is Ward, primarily because he was often in fights like that. Where they were nip and tuck fights yet somehow people gave him every close round for 11-1 type cards in 7-5 6-6 type fights.

[Earl-Hickey]

When A fighter they support loses or when a boxer they dislikes wins?? They have no complaints when their fighters win close fights but if they lose a close fight it is all the sudden a robbery or compubox is wrong...how hard is it to just get credit where it is due?

It works both ways and posters need to try and drop their bias.

I've been guilty of this in the past (Dirrell vs Froch) where I knew Dirrell won that fight and got stitched up but I brushed it under the carpet.

I can't think of any fight in recent years where I've defended this however, and even when I was a big AJ fan I said the ref gave Parker a really raw deal.

[daggum]

that's why i said it's NEVER accurate my friend.

its accurate for larry if he wants it to be accurate. obviously larry is not hte type of person that would actually go back and watch a fight to see what happened, its easier to just take compuboxs word for it.

[Roadblock]

give credit to compubox when its wrong? why?

Because the very next fight you will say they were right if it fits your agenda, so it really boils down to your own opinion whether they got it right or wrong and we all know thats as biased as fck.