Jermall Charlo vs Danny Jacobs at 160

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Ultralight
    Up and Comer
    Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
    • Feb 2018
    • 68
    • 55
    • 20
    • 7,789

    #1

    Jermall Charlo vs Danny Jacobs at 160

    Who would win?
  • TheSlickster
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Apr 2010
    • 1315
    • 128
    • 73
    • 15,543

    #2
    although Jermall beat Dervchenko more decisively than Jacobs did, Jacobs wins 7 rounds to 5.

    Comment

    • Dip_Slide
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Oct 2015
      • 2655
      • 240
      • 11
      • 34,495

      #3
      Skillwise I think both are very even, both are big and have power so it will come down to who can take it better and who wants it more and I think at this point in time it's Jermall Charlo. He seems more hungry and more motivated than Jacobs especially after Jacob's disappointing performance against Canelo where he just didn't show enough will to go through the fire to win. I also think the weight cut has been increasingly hard for Jacobs and that making 160 would take a lot out of him.

      Slight edge to Charlo but I'd love/pay to see it especially at 168
      Last edited by Dip_Slide; 09-27-2020, 05:31 PM.

      Comment

      • boliodogs
        Undisputed Champion
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • May 2008
        • 33358
        • 824
        • 1,782
        • 309,589

        #4
        Originally posted by Ultralight
        Who would win?
        I think Jermall beats Jacobs at 160 and 168. Jermall is peaking and looked great last night Jacobs is going down hill. Jacobs looked bad against Chavez Jr in his last fight. Some boxers age better than others and Jacobs is 34 years old and not aging well. I thought he fought poorly against Canelo and worse yet against Chavez jr.

        Comment

        Working...
        TOP