Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

NSB PICK EM #56 AND #57 19th SEPTEMBER 2020

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #51
    Originally posted by Tatabanya View Post
    Last chance I gave to Gausha, I really thought he could have upset Lubin had he not been so lame.

    Lubin has not been the same since Charlo disintegrated him.

    I'll probably stick to regular picks from now on, in preparation for the next season. The legendary quest for the implausible upset is officially over!
    Lubin hasnt looked the same at all. I was expecting him to just blow Guasha out with now problem, seemed very timid and his power doesn't seem to be there either. He needs another fight before the WBC championship, IMHO.

    Comment


    • #52
      Originally posted by NC Uppercut View Post
      Man I had no help last night. I reached out to another crew member to see if he could help to.e stamp since they were so close, but anyhow.
      Time stamp was three minutes after my prediction. I snapped a photo with the time as the ref was about to unleash them. I could help out when I can by posting such a picture in the future.

      Comment


      • #53
        Originally posted by TheMyspaceDayz View Post
        Time stamp was three minutes after my prediction. I snapped a photo with the time as the ref was about to unleash them. I could help out when I can by posting such a picture in the future.
        *******, its usually not a problem. I was flipping back and forth between Sho and ESPN+ and was getting the heavy eyes. No worries, no problem. Appreciate the offer. The other
        Crew member should've stepped up, but then again no telling what he was into. Peace, good luck on your future picks.

        Comment


        • #54
          Originally posted by NC Uppercut View Post
          *******, its usually not a problem. I was flipping back and forth between Sho and ESPN+ and was getting the heavy eyes. No worries, no problem. Appreciate the offer. The other
          Crew member should've stepped up, but then again no telling what he was into. Peace, good luck on your future picks.
          Feel free to use the idea, whatever the case. The photo removes any doubt.

          Comment


          • #55
            Originally posted by TheMyspaceDayz View Post
            Feel free to use the idea, whatever the case. The photo removes any doubt.
            You got it brother. Nice thought

            Comment


            • #56
              Originally posted by TheMyspaceDayz View Post
              Feel free to use the idea, whatever the case. The photo removes any doubt.
              Originally posted by NC Uppercut View Post
              You got it brother. Nice thought
              It's a good suggestion, and FWIW I'd say I'm basically happy for any of the regualar players to call the opening bell with a quick post on the relevent Pick Em thread if one of the CREW doesn't make it for whatever reason. In general it's possible to cross reference with the FBF threads to get a relatively accurate time point anyway but it's both more convenient and better in the case of disputes if we get a proper timestamp.

              In this case I'm not seeing there's actually an issue, you've already acknowledged you were pre-occupied NC and I've seen nothing about your behaviour to even suggest we need to see your screenshot for proof *******, so there's no actual dispute here. However if you'd be willing to take on the role as a kinda semi-official Pick Em timekeeper for those fights you watch ******* I reckon we'd all welcome the contribution... more hands we got on deck, less likelihood there is of **** ups. You reckon you'd be up for that?

              Comment


              • #57
                Originally posted by Citizen Koba View Post
                It's a good suggestion, and FWIW I'd say I'm basically happy for any of the regualar players to call the opening bell with a quick post on the relevent Pick Em thread if one of the CREW doesn't make it for whatever reason. In general it's possible to cross reference with the FBF threads to get a relatively accurate time point anyway but it's both more convenient and better in the case of disputes if we get a proper timestamp.

                In this case I'm not seeing there's actually an issue, you've already acknowledged you were pre-occupied NC and I've seen nothing about your behaviour to even suggest we need to see your screenshot for proof *******, so there's no actual dispute here. However if you'd be willing to take on the role as a kinda semi-official Pick Em timekeeper for those fights you watch ******* I reckon we'd all welcome the contribution... more hands we got on deck, less likelihood there is of **** ups. You reckon you'd be up for that?
                I can time stamp what I can. I’m forced to stream sometimes and in those cases a screenshot isn’t accurate because the feed is delayed. Will see how it goes.

                Comment


                • #58
                  Originally posted by TheMyspaceDayz View Post
                  I can time stamp what I can. I’m forced to stream sometimes and in those cases a screenshot isn’t accurate because the feed is delayed. Will see how it goes.
                  When you can is all anyone can ask, man. All I'm thinking is we all got different commintments and might catch some fights, miss others. More people on it the better I reckon.

                  Comment


                  • #59
                    Originally posted by Citizen Koba View Post
                    When you can is all anyone can ask, man. All I'm thinking is we all got different commintments and might catch some fights, miss others. More people on it the better I reckon.
                    So both fights were wide decisions in the end?

                    Comment


                    • #60
                      Originally posted by BobLoblaw View Post
                      So both fights were wide decisions in the end?
                      Yeah, looking at it. Pedraza was obviously wide, but the 118 - 110 card by Shreck took Erickson well past the 12 points margin required for a WIDE DEC.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP