Nah, unless you are Whyte it is very irrelevant. PBC/haymon controls the WBC at HW. Ortiz hasn;t beaten anyone of note, he lost twice in two years under the WBC HW, but he never moves from that number 3. And its not like the person he lost to had beaten anyone else of note, in fact Povetkin's resume is better than Wilder, Ortiz put together.
What if Wilder stops Fury in the trilogy, then unifies against AJ?
I just can't see that happening to be honest.
Fury pretty much outboxed him in the first fight and then dominated him physically in the second.
Wilder has that power for sure, but he will be more gun shy after the beat down he took in the second fight.
I still believe he could KO Joshua though, mainly because Joshua is so open to an overhand right because his only defense against it is to step backward - he always gets tagged.
Because Ruiz and Fury have the same stance and fighting style? Truly clueless.
Fury is levels better than Ruiz and AJ got beat up by Ruiz. So you're truly clueless if you think AJ is going to last longer with fury than he lasted with Ruiz. Just poking hole in your anti wilder propaganda and slander
Fury is levels better than Ruiz and AJ got beat up by Ruiz. So you're truly clueless if you think AJ is going to last longer with fury than he lasted with Ruiz. Just poking hole in your anti wilder propaganda and slander
Wilder is a completely different size, height and style to Ruiz, so by suggesting that because he was beaten by a short, flabby Ruiz he would obviously be beaten by Wilder or Fury is beyond ******.
Styles make fights, if a man is vulnerable to a certain move or style of fighting it doesn't follow that anybody bigger and stronger with a totally different style would have any success whatsoever.
I swear a lot of people on this site have never even seen a boxing match, let alone boxed themselves. So many clueless comments.
Comment