Comments Thread For: Charlo Twins Pay-Per-View Event To Carry SRP Of $74.95

[KTFOKING]

This was the standard price for Floyd fights.

Not for first time PPV headliners.

Just because Floyd worked his ass off to get to the point where he could demand $74.95 doesn't mean every other PPV wannabe gets to charge the same. WTF?

How much was Spence vs Garcia?

How much Wilder vs Ortiz?

How much was Spence vs Porter?

How much was Pacquiao vs Thurman?

Which PPV has the PBC done less that price point?

[The Big Dunn]

Who is going to invite friends to come pay for your PPV during a pandemic?

I just had 2 friends and my cousin over last night for nba and football.

I have a large basement with 2 tv’s so I can easily accommodate 6 or 7 people with Masks and social distance to watch the fight.

[The Big Dunn]

The only good fights are the twins. I mean it’s a bit fraudish to promote Nery and Casimero when those bouts are pending approval

Ok fair point. But I still think the cards are good and plan to purchase them:

Yes, it’s overpriced for the talent level.

[ShoulderRoll]

How much was Spence vs Garcia?

How much Wilder vs Ortiz?

How much was Spence vs Porter?

How much was Pacquiao vs Thurman?

Which PPV has the PBC done less that price point?

Pacquiao can charge what he wants, he earned it.

The rest of those fights weren't worth that much. In Spence's case at least they have slowly tried to build his profile up, though. From drawing 6 million viewers after the Olympics and then going forward.

The Charlos aren't on that level.

[jonnyc420]

Nah, I would have paid $60 max, nice card and all but looks like I am heading out to deeper waters for this.

[Bronx23]

Don’t buy it. Let it tank so they can stop putting non PPV worthy fights on PPV. Supporting this only allows them to do It again in the future. This is not a PPV caliber fight.

Santa Cruz vs Tank is not a PPV caliber fight

Thurman-Porter, Porter-Garcia, Thurman-Garcia, Spence-Brook, Spence-Porter were all free, so someone please explain to me why in the hell is Danny Garcia vs Spence PPV ??

Crackstreams, vipbox, buffstreamz - you’re welcome

[wrecksracer]

The success of a PPV depends on casual fans knowing who is fighting. I'm not sure this is the case with the Charlos.

[TrillScottHeron]

This is the most stacked card of the year. 5 title fights. Why are so many against purchasing this one? I’m bias b/c I’m from Houston, and a big fan of Charlos. But I would buy this card no matter what.

[ShoulderRoll]

Don’t buy it. Let it tank so they can stop putting non PPV worthy fights on PPV. Supporting this only allows them to do It again in the future. This is not a PPV caliber fight.

Santa Cruz vs Tank is not a PPV caliber fight

Thurman-Porter, Porter-Garcia, Thurman-Garcia, Spence-Brook, Spence-Porter were all free, so someone please explain to me why in the hell is Danny Garcia vs Spence PPV ??

Crackstreams, vipbox, buffstreamz - you’re welcome

This is absolutely a PPV caliber card.

But it is not worthy of a $74.95 price tag.

$50 to $60 would have been perfect.

[KTFOKING]

Pacquiao can charge what he wants, he earned it.

The rest of those fights weren't worth that much. In Spence's case at least they have slowly tried to build his profile up, though. From drawing 6 million viewers after the Olympics and then going forward.

The Charlos aren't on that level.

Now you are trying to move the goalposts. This is a non-issue. The PPV price was always going to be this much. That is just standard for the PBC PPVs.