When lomo beats teo he'll be p4p #1 no debate

['b']

I think it would make Loma a solid #2 ahead of Crawford, but Canelo would still be #1. The only blight on Canelo's resume is perhaps the draw against GGG which should be a loss and the fact he weight drained Kovalev - still a great win but with a little asterisk. That win however was still better than anything Loma has done imo.

[buddyr]

I see this fight going one of 2 ways. Either Loma is gonna outbox him or Teo is gonna knock him out. The sure things are that, Teo aint outboxing Loma and Loma aint gonna stand and trade and get the better of the exchanges. So that's it. Either we're gonna see the smaller better boxer get ko'd after having some success like Arguello vs Pryor or we're gonna see the smaller better boxer outclass bigger/stronger puncher that has some boxing skill too(Roy JOnes vs James Toney).

[boliodogs]

It is not a 50/50 fight. Loma is a big betting favorite. Lopez is the promising but unproven new guy with no rating yet on any PFP best lists so beating Lopez does not move Loma up higher on any pfp lists except maybe yours. Loma is already number 1 pfp on most lists and number 1 is as high as you can go. if Lopez wins he gets on the pfp best lists as high as one wants to put him. If Loma wins it is just another good win that he was expected to win and he goes no higher pfp because he is already number 1.

[boliodogs]

Right now Loma is a -365 favorite to win so you need to bet $365 on Loma to win $100 if he wins. Lopez is a +275 underdog so if you bet $100 on Lopez you win $275 if he wins. So this is not even close to a 50/50 fight. Loma is a big betting favorite to win.

[hhh1200]

Nope. Since Crawford actually fought at 135 and Loma's team made it clear if he was around that weight, there was no way in hell they'd fight him. That alone tells me Crawford is the better fighter and ranks ahead of him. That;s like saying GGG is better than Ward but when the fight was proposed to him, he said, No Ward, too good. End of story. Canelo got to much ***** attached to his career to ever rank him P4P 1.

[LoadedWraps]

He was way past his prime. After that fight he got koed by Joshua and then retired. So no beating a faded champ who’s almost 40 is not more impressive than beating an undefeated young champ in his prime.

It absolutely is. A undefeated champ isn't undisputed nor has had a long defense record.

Ridiculous for you to try and argue an unproven unbeaten fighter is a better win than an established kingpin of a division.

Again, no active boxer has a better win. Pacquiao has the most stacked resume of active fighters and none of his wins come close.

[TheCell8]

No, he won't be.

Unless you rate Lopez as a P4P level fighter. I think Lopez is a good fighter, but Loma shouldn't lose that fight.

Loma will be up there, probably top 3 and definitely higher than Inoue. But not higher than Canelo or Crawford.

[Larry the boss]

So Lopez isnt "green" at 23 but Canelo was?

[Outwest Exp 355]

I think so but Loma isn’t beating Lopez so none of this matters anyway.

[satiev1]

It absolutely is. A undefeated champ isn't undisputed nor has had a long defense record.

Ridiculous for you to try and argue an unproven unbeaten fighter is a better win than an established kingpin of a division.

Again, no active boxer has a better win. Pacquiao has the most stacked resume of active fighters and none of his wins come close.

Stop it. Wlad was almost 40 and got koed in his next fight. He retired right after because he was no longer the same fighter. For you to argue that he wasn't is laughable. That's like saying it's impressive beating Ali in his last fight or beating joy jones at 40.