Comments Thread For: Jose Ramirez Cautioned By WBO Of Overdue Mandatory Defense vs. Catterall

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Vinnykin
    replied
    Originally posted by Greenfield02
    Oh, and you want to watch that fight over Ramirez vs Taylor? Ok
    Of course not, but trying to say Catterall shouldn't even be ranked that high is nonsense...... he's been holding belts with the WBO for 5 years.

    Leave a comment:


  • tokon
    replied
    Originally posted by techliam
    What agreement?
    Do you have a link please?
    Sorry, don't have a link, it's just something I was pretty sure had been agreed between the main sanctioning organisations. Maybe I just made it up?

    Leave a comment:


  • sicko
    replied
    Further proof that it is these Belt Organizations RUINED BOXING!

    They force us to have to watch this Sh^t mismatches and fans only want to blame the fighter and they will be accusing Ramirez of "Cherry Picking" if he go ahead and take care of this guy if they can't make Ramirez vs Taylor this year

    Leave a comment:


  • techliam
    replied
    Originally posted by tokon
    Way happened to the "unifications trump mandatories" agreement that the sanctioning bodies were supposed to have made?

    Taylor v Ramirez, with a contractual undertaking that winner makes first defence against catterall?

    Then other mandatories in agreed rotation as they come due.
    What agreement?
    Do you have a link please?

    Leave a comment:


  • Greenfield02
    replied
    Originally posted by Vinnykin
    What do you mean Catterall shouldn't be ranked that high? He's won the inter-continental WBO in 2015 and defended it over ten times.

    That's how you climb the rankings.

    Catterall is a banana-skin for Ramirez, very good fighter and not an easy win for any one in the division.
    Oh, and you want to watch that fight over Ramirez vs Taylor? Ok

    Leave a comment:


  • Thuglife Nelo
    replied
    Originally posted by tokon
    Way happened to the "unifications trump mandatories" agreement that the sanctioning bodies were supposed to have made?

    Taylor v Ramirez, with a contractual undertaking that winner makes first defence against catterall?

    Then other mandatories in agreed rotation as they come due.
    That’s up to Taylor agreeing to a deal before his fight. Since Taylor hasn’t not Ramirez, they can troll the promoters to make a decision. Arum vs Warren atm. Two WBO pimps. I’m sure Bob will figure something out so that Ramirez unifies without the harassment

    Leave a comment:


  • tokon
    replied
    Way happened to the "unifications trump mandatories" agreement that the sanctioning bodies were supposed to have made?

    Taylor v Ramirez, with a contractual undertaking that winner makes first defence against catterall?

    Then other mandatories in agreed rotation as they come due.

    Leave a comment:


  • Thuglife Nelo
    replied
    This is just Warren and Paco getting hyped to do their usual ongoing WBO Bidness.

    Leave a comment:


  • GlassJoey
    replied
    I think Catterall will show whether the Frank Warren or Dillian Whyte method of waiting for a title shot works best. I think Catterall will go the way of Yarde when the time comes

    Leave a comment:


  • Bronx2245
    replied
    Would the WBO be that ******? I could see enforcing the mandatory if Josh Taylor lost, but not if there's a chance for a 4-belt unification fight! No matter what they choose to do, Ramirez vs. Taylor, make it happen! F*^k a belt!

    Leave a comment:

Working...
TOP