(the whole truth) the real reason bradley ripped gervonta davis

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • YoungManRumble
    Paper Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Aug 2019
    • 9843
    • 2,129
    • 975
    • 33,413

    #11
    Originally posted by BoxingIsGreat
    What race baiting? It's his perspective and I agree with him. The whole ESPN panel, including Ward, disagreed with Bradley's take on Davis.
    I skimmed through it cause I can't stand that channel but he was doing his usual stuff of claiming everyone is racist and great white hope this and that. Can you only criticize someone who shares your skin pigment or lack thereof?

    As for the 3 undefeated fighters in a row. The last 2 were undefeated domestic level fighters with obviously padded records, so there's that counter point. We all know undefeated means little when the resume is filled with wins over guys with negative records.

    If all he's trying to say is that Timmy should be criticizing everyone's resume equally then I don't disagree with that but why would Bradley bring up GGG or something when they're discussing fighters around super feather / lightweight? Seems like an odd reach

    Comment

    • daggum
      All time great
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Feb 2008
      • 43820
      • 4,706
      • 3
      • 166,270

      #12
      Originally posted by YoungManRumble
      I skimmed through it cause I can't stand that channel but he was doing his usual stuff of claiming everyone is racist and great white hope this and that. Can you only criticize someone who shares your skin pigment or lack thereof?

      As for the 3 undefeated fighters in a row. The last 2 were undefeated domestic level fighters with obviously padded records, so there's that counter point. We all know undefeated means little when the resume is filled with wins over guys with negative records.

      If all he's trying to say is that Timmy should be criticizing everyone's resume equally then I don't disagree with that but why would Bradley bring up GGG or something when they're discussing fighters around super feather / lightweight? Seems like an odd reach
      why anyone would watch that trash...its like watching fox news. it will melt your brain.] tank has fought zero top 10 ranked fighters the last 4 years. zero! ggg fought 10 top his first 5 years in the US. oh yeah and he did this while trying to fight all the best fighters in his division while tank actively avoided everyone in his division. why arent you equating 2 completely different things!

      Comment

      • daggum
        All time great
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Feb 2008
        • 43820
        • 4,706
        • 3
        • 166,270

        #13
        can you think of anyone who is considered "championship" level who has had a worse resume the last 4 years than tank? maybe some random champ from overseas who no one cares about. maybe them? im not even sure though. definitely no one on the american networks thats for sure. when you compare tank to one of his peers like loma, loma has fought 5 top 10 guys in a row now with i think 4 in the top 5 and 2 of them were the top ranked guy. tank over there with his undefeated bums who have never fought anyone, old shot fighters, and tiny unranked fighters. you dont have to fool 100 percent of the people watching. just enough to get you paid. its targeted programing to get the ignorant viewers. back in the old days these are the people who thought magic was real and would play 3 card monty till they lost all their money. now its just a different scam for the 21st century

        Comment

        Working...
        TOP