Comments Thread For: Porter-Formella FOX Main Event Peaked At 1,225,000 Viewers; Averaged 1,077,000

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • sicko
    The Truth Hurts
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • May 2010
    • 34211
    • 2,594
    • 839
    • 151,307

    #11
    I don't blame Porter for this at all...Boxing Is not as popular as the other sports that was on and started at the same time

    You had NBA Playoffs on Free TV (ABC) and NHL Hockey on Free TV (NBC) as well as a UFC Card on ESPN so no this Card wasn't going to do big Ratings and I'm sure Lara Card this weekend will be even Lower than this Rating

    Boxing will never be able to compete with those other Sports EVER! So when it goes head to head with NBA it will always get Squashed! That is a Boxing Issue not really just a "Shawn Porter Is Not A Draw" issue. FOX should be happy they was able to even get that high considering what it was up against.

    Comment

    • jabuppercut
      Contender
      Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
      • Mar 2018
      • 352
      • 148
      • 25
      • 8,160

      #12
      It's sad more viewers didn't tune in

      Comment

      • BIGPOPPAPUMP
        Franchise Champion
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Sep 2003
        • 46539
        • 2,259
        • 334
        • 5,493,285

        #13
        Comments Thread For: Porter-Formella FOX Main Event Peaked At 1,225,000 Viewers; Averaged 1,077,000

        FOX's viewership of its main event Saturday night was almost identical to the totals from the network's previous boxing broadcast. Nielsen Media Research revealed Tuesday that FOX's main event Saturday night, Shawn Porter-Sebastian Formella, drew a peak audience of 1,225,000 and an average audience of 1,077,000. FOX's prior main event, Jamal James-Thomas Dulorme on August 8, was watched by a peak audience of 1,224,000 and drew an average viewership of 1,076,000.
        [Click Here To Read More]

        Comment

        • rudy
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Sep 2003
          • 5886
          • 660
          • 1,175
          • 52,192

          #14
          why is Fox viewing figures so much higher than espn excuse me as from UK

          Comment

          • Bob Haymon
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Aug 2014
            • 1558
            • 187
            • 295
            • 33,115

            #15
            Paradise Hotel set the bar extremely low on Fox and PBC still managing to do even worse ratings.

            Comment

            • SHOOTALLCLOWNS
              Interim Champion
              Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
              • Nov 2018
              • 621
              • 20
              • 4
              • 14,984

              #16
              Originally posted by richardt
              I thought Porter boxed extremely well and didn't smother himself or do the linebacker bit. One of the most impressive showings I've seen him in. I like the guy a lot.
              look at the caliber of his opponent it was against a guy who was not a threat. porter could not knock him out or even seriously hurt the guy. it was a showcase fight porter should have stopped him to create some excitement for himself.

              Comment

              • gdub27
                Interim Champion
                Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                • Sep 2008
                • 570
                • 20
                • 2
                • 9,958

                #17
                Fox is over the airwaves free tv, and espn is a cable or subscription service.

                Comment

                • Mister Wolf
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Jan 2012
                  • 7434
                  • 241
                  • 14
                  • 107,507

                  #18
                  Originally posted by rudy
                  why is Fox viewing figures so much higher than espn excuse me as from UK
                  Fox is free television, ESPN isn't. I'm paying $25 a month right now through Sling just to get access to ESPN.

                  Comment

                  • jonnyc420
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Sep 2015
                    • 7457
                    • 2,170
                    • 1,072
                    • 53,984

                    #19
                    Love to see it, much needed for the sport. I wonder how it did with the UFC that was on ESPN same night and same time.

                    Comment

                    • SHOOTALLCLOWNS
                      Interim Champion
                      Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                      • Nov 2018
                      • 621
                      • 20
                      • 4
                      • 14,984

                      #20
                      Originally posted by rudy
                      why is Fox viewing figures so much higher than espn excuse me as from UK
                      fox is a free channel. anybody can watch fox as its one of the big four broadcasting networks in which you don't need cable to watch. you to pay for cable in order to get espn. more people can watch fox vs espn.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP