Michael Hunter is levels above Dillian Whyte

[ShaneMosleySr]

Hunter would destroy Whyte if that fight was ever made.

He would brutally knock Whyte out inside of six rounds.

Reminder: Hunter wasn’t even good at Cruiserweight.

[Inspired]

hunter has a chin on him, he also learnt from the hunter fight to fight with volume (which he showed against bakole) BUT he does lack single punch knock out power.

then again when i said hunter was underrated, people said he's trash.

[Earl-Hickey]

Lol calm down.

Whyte was making Povetkin look ****e then he got caught with a silly shot. **** happens and styles make fights.

[deathofaclown]

Povetkin is shot to bits and still folded Whyte

Whyte is nowhere near the level of the top heavyweights.

[Mammoth]

Hunter was good at Cruiserweight. Goddamn you're a negative *****.

[MaksBox]

Hunter vs Whyte... Hunter would get KOed.

Styles make fights and Whyte was tailor made for Povetkin... just like Povetkin was taylor made for Hunter.

[Robbie Barrett]

This fight got you all wet? How many threads have you made, how many more do you plan to make? All that emotion of years of Wilder ducking suddenly getting released?

[JakeTheBoxer]

Boxing logic. Hunter destroys Whyte, because Povetkin beat Whyte with lucky punch.

[W1LL]

I think Michael Hunter has every chance of outboxing Dillian Whyte, would have too much movement and speed for him. Dillian very telegraphic and methodical tonight, lumbering.

[TheCell8]

Hunter is a "smarter" more craftier fighter than Whyte. I think it's mainly due to necessity since he's a CW moving up to fight bigger fighters.

But I think Whyte is more lethal. He's more explosive and hits harder.

If they were to matchup, I think I would lean towards Whyte winning that fight.