Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Anyone else agree with me that Clarissa Shields would beat prime Ann Wolfe?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Originally posted by HitmanTommy View Post
    So I was sippin on a 40 with the homies while chilling on the porch around 3am when I brought up Clarissa Shields.

    I said Shields would have beat the shyt out of Ann Wolfe in her prime. It got quiet and not a single homie agreed with me.

    I can't be the only one that thinks this, can I?
    stop doing drugs

    shields has nothing close in either technique or power

    Comment


    • #12
      Originally posted by boliodogs View Post
      I disagree with you and think a prime Ann Wolfe just murders her and knock her out cold.Look at their records. Wolfe KOed most of her opponents while Shields almost never wins by ko or knocks anyone down. Wolfe was a vicious scary puncher. I would add that Shields has the worst personality of any boxer male or female in my opinion. She is an arrogant, conceited disrespectful bragger.
      Well Valerie Mahfood knocked out Ann Wolfe and she’s a bum so... I get people her hate certain types of outspoken boxers I get it but skills do pay the bills and tbh Ann Wolfe fought and ko’d a lot of novice females while Clarissa Shields fought more polished fighters so minus the distaste for Shields that must be taken into account. Btw most female boxers for the most part are not that good tbh.

      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by Mrsantiago View Post
        Well Valerie Mahfood knocked out Ann Wolfe and she’s a bum so... I get people her hate certain types of outspoken boxers I get it but skills do pay the bills and tbh Ann Wolfe fought and ko’d a lot of novice females while Clarissa Shields fought more polished fighters so minus the distaste for Shields that must be taken into account. Btw most female boxers for the most part are not that good tbh.
        This X 1000

        It amazes me that dudes on here simultaneously criticize the lack of competition in women's boxing, yet constantly talk about how Laila Ali or Ann Wolfe would beat Claressa Shields, whos fighting in an era with wayyyyyy better competition than the '90s and '2000s.

        Wolfe & Ali were beating housewives and truck stop **********s.

        Women's boxing didn't even exist in the Olympics back then.

        There were like 3 world class women in the world back then.

        There's like 20 now.

        It'd be like arguing that one of those guys in the NBA back in the 1930s where they used to have to use a stick to get the ball out the basket would beat LeBron in 1 on 1.

        It's ridiculous.

        So yes, I agree with you. Shields has 2 Olympic gold medals and would simply outclass Wolfe

        Comment


        • #14
          Originally posted by The D3vil View Post
          This X 1000

          It amazes me that dudes on here simultaneously criticize the lack of competition in women's boxing, yet constantly talk about how Laila Ali or Ann Wolfe would beat Claressa Shields, whos fighting in an era with wayyyyyy better competition than the '90s and '2000s.

          Wolfe & Ali were beating housewives and truck stop **********s.

          Women's boxing didn't even exist in the Olympics back then.

          There were like 3 world class women in the world back then.

          There's like 20 now.

          It'd be like arguing that one of those guys in the NBA back in the 1930s where they used to have to use a stick to get the ball out the basket would beat LeBron in 1 on 1.

          It's ridiculous.

          So yes, I agree with you. Shields has 2 Olympic gold medals and would simply outclass Wolfe
          Finally someone that agrees.

          Comment


          • #15
            It's hard to pick against Wolfe, but I wouldn't be shocked if Shields upset Wolfe.

            Comment


            • #16
              Originally posted by The D3vil View Post
              This X 1000

              It amazes me that dudes on here simultaneously criticize the lack of competition in women's boxing, yet constantly talk about how Laila Ali or Ann Wolfe would beat Claressa Shields, whos fighting in an era with wayyyyyy better competition than the '90s and '2000s.

              Wolfe & Ali were beating housewives and truck stop **********s.

              Women's boxing didn't even exist in the Olympics back then.

              There were like 3 world class women in the world back then.

              There's like 20 now.

              It'd be like arguing that one of those guys in the NBA back in the 1930s where they used to have to use a stick to get the ball out the basket would beat LeBron in 1 on 1.

              It's ridiculous.

              So yes, I agree with you. Shields has 2 Olympic gold medals and would simply outclass Wolfe

              Big factssss!! But remember what type of forum this is so most people here dksab and find a way to hate on certain types even if it means praising others that are from the same group but are no longer fighting because they don’t have anyone else to use.

              Comment


              • #17
                I don't like Shields but what others have said is true in wolfes era she was fighting daycare teachers who did boxfercise classes, women's boxing still is a shallow talent pool but Shields at least fights somewhat legitimate athletes.

                Not sure who wins, and I'm not going to go analyze tape of women's boxing but it wouldn't shock me if I did and settled on Shields being the better boxer.

                Comment


                • #18
                  would be an interesting fight

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X
                  TOP