Is floyd a natural cherry picker?

[Roadblock]

BHop, who said no "white boy" would ever beat him?

Mcgirt, who everytime you see him you can bet on whoever he is giving advice to in a fight to lose?

Dillian Whyte, a two time drug cheat who ducks one 40 year old by calling him too old, then fights two other guys the same age?

Put the Lambanóg down...

And Mcgirt was answering a loaded question, would you take Mannys legacy over Floyds money, now Buddy is not that quick, ask him whos boxing career he would like to have and its an entirely different conversation, These idiots run with anything.

[pasawayako]

Valdez BLAMES Mayweather for fighter ducking the best

Another boxer who think that floyd is a cherry picker.

[pasawayako]

I think this is so obvious now that almost everyone saying one thing about floyd that he's a cherey picker.

[BodyBagz]

https://www.espn.com/boxing/story/_/id/29107427/mayweather-pacquiao-revisiting-richest-fight-boxing-history

Pacquiao said: "For me, as long as the drug test is not done close to the match, I'll agree because if they'll get blood from me close to the match, it will be a disadvantage for me because I'm smaller and he's big."

[DaBeastO]

Yes yes and yes!!!!

[BodyBagz]

What does size have to do with blood tests ?!?!?!?

[BoZz]

We all know that mcgirt, bhops, whyte etc have one thing in common when talking about floyd opponent
"Floyd fought boxer under his terms/under his watch"

If these very knowledgeable boxing people keep saying this thing and i think everyone knows and will agree that floyd will only fight if all the terms and his demands are meet and also pick the the right timing when to fight that opponent.

Is this type of boxer what you call a natural cherry picker?

If he's a cherry picker then pacquiao must be the inventor of cherry picking.

I mean we all know that when pacquiao fought in his early days and when he was evenly matched he was always in a war, some he won some he lost but even when he won he was in a war, he received a lots of damage.

Later on none of his fights mattered, he was fighting for titles like cotto for example where the fighter had to come in at a catch weight. The same goes for nearly all of his opponents, de la hoya nearly starved himself to death. Every opponent was hand picked smartly by Arum to make Pacquiao the super star.

He knew how to create a "legend" which will give him a following of millions out of his native country the Filipines.

Like I said, against Floyd he got schooled, he beat a damaged hatton who was a done man after the floyd fight. Against JMM he got nearly killed. So that shows you he was only doing well against drained fighters cherry picked by arum and against fighters who already lost to Floyd.

I still think pac is a great fighter tho, he went to wars a few times..I like his old fights, even when he lost he did it in fashion. But all those later fights?! Come on man, they don't count lol

[pasawayako]

https://www.espn.com/boxing/story/_/...boxing-history

Pacquiao said: "For me, as long as the drug test is not done close to the match, I'll agree because if they'll get blood from me close to the match, it will be a disadvantage for me because I'm smaller and he's big."

Everone already knew who ducked who that's why u can't hear from the knowledgeable people in boxing that pac cherry pjck his opponents but on the other hand almost everyone think that about floyd.

[pasawayako]

If he's a cherry picker then pacquiao must be the inventor of cherry picking.

I mean we all know that when pacquiao fought in his early days and when he was evenly matched he was always in a war, some he won some he lost but even when he won he was in a war, he received a lots of damage.

Later on none of his fights mattered, he was fighting for titles like cotto for example where the fighter had to come in at a catch weight. The same goes for nearly all of his opponents, de la hoya nearly starved himself to death. Every opponent was hand picked smartly by Arum to make Pacquiao the super star.

He knew how to create a "legend" which will give him a following of millions out of his native country the Filipines.

Like I said, against Floyd he got schooled, he beat a damaged hatton who was a done man after the floyd fight. Against JMM he got nearly killed. So that shows you he was only doing well against drained fighters cherry picked by arum and against fighters who already lost to Floyd.

I still think pac is a great fighter tho, he went to wars a few times..I like his old fights, even when he lost he did it in fashion. But all those later fights?! Come on man, they don't count lol

Everyone knew that pac is a warrior and will fight everyone that's why you never heard anyone from the knowledgeable people in boxing calling pac a cherry picker but those knowledgeable people in boxing have one thing in common when talking about floyd " floyd only fought guys under his terms/watched" (means cherry picker).

[hugh grant]

Everyone knew that pac is a warrior and will fight everyone that's why you never heard anyone from the knowledgeable people in boxing calling pac a cherry picker but those knowledgeable people in boxing have one thing in common when talking about floyd " floyd only fought guys under his terms/watched" (means cherry picker).

So true. Good observation. So many people in boxing publicly call Floyd s cheery picker and Nobody has ever said that about pac! Do floyd fans wonder why?
Floyd fans have realised this that's why every Floyd fan says pac s the cherry picker, they over compensate and over do it.
You sometimes think to yourself calm down dear