So, we’re done criticizing GGG-Szeremeta right?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ShaneMosleySr
    Banned
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Mar 2019
    • 10325
    • 1,049
    • 903
    • 276,311

    #31
    They agreed to fight again.

    The date was the sticking point.

    It no longer is because we’re still in the middle of a pandemic.

    Originally posted by techliam
    Pretty sure no one disputes the idea that Golovkin would move up to fight Canelo again. That’s retirement money. He isn’t (or hasn’t) moving up for anyone else, so quite clearly a financial motive

    But it only matters when they both get into the ring. There’s nothing agreed at all

    Comment

    • techliam
      Caneloweight Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Apr 2012
      • 5526
      • 371
      • 23
      • 42,424

      #32
      Originally posted by ShaneMosleySr
      They agreed to fight again.

      The date was the sticking point.

      It no longer is because we’re still in the middle of a pandemic.
      When the fight gets announced, you can sing Golovkin’s praises all you want for taking another payday. Until then, it’s fantasy

      Comment

      • ShaneMosleySr
        Banned
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Mar 2019
        • 10325
        • 1,049
        • 903
        • 276,311

        #33
        You realize it was announced that they agreed to fight a third time, right?

        Originally posted by techliam
        When the fight gets announced, you can sing Golovkin’s praises all you want for taking another payday. Until then, it’s fantasy

        Comment

        • techliam
          Caneloweight Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Apr 2012
          • 5526
          • 371
          • 23
          • 42,424

          #34
          Originally posted by ShaneMosleySr
          You realize it was announced that they agreed to fight a third time, right?
          Like I said, a gross misreading of the article. I suggest you read it again. Both being open to it, and both contractually agreeing to it, are hugely different things

          Again, I hope you are pretending not to understand very simple things, publicly

          Comment

          • ShaneMosleySr
            Banned
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Mar 2019
            • 10325
            • 1,049
            • 903
            • 276,311

            #35
            I never said there was a contract.

            There is a verbal agreement for the fight to take place.

            Originally posted by techliam
            Like I said, a gross misreading of the article. I suggest you read it again. Both being open to it, and both contractually agreeing to it, are hugely different things

            Again, I hope you are pretending not to understand very simple things, publicly

            Comment

            • techliam
              Caneloweight Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Apr 2012
              • 5526
              • 371
              • 23
              • 42,424

              #36
              Originally posted by ShaneMosleySr
              I never said there was a contract.

              There is a verbal agreement for the fight to take place.
              Good. So until that contract is signed, it’s all fantasy. Verbal agreements (though I dispute that, they only said they are open to it) are never a guarantee of a fight happening

              Comment

              Working...
              TOP