Comments Thread For: Carl Froch Explains Why Whyte Should Get Crack at Fury Before Joshua Does

[alexguiness]

It is so hard to take Froch seriously as a pundit.

[Monty Fisto]

I don't really like Whyte but I'm with Carl on this, privilege is the enemy of fairness, and boxing has waaay too much privilege. I get it, everyone wants to make the most money, get the biggest names to fight one another, but far as I'm concerned you start ignoring the few rules that were put there to ensure the challengers who worked there way up get their shots, then the fancy titles - and the sport itself - lose even more of what little legitimacy they already got.

Imagine having the World Cup and just saying well let's just fuck off the qualifiers and early rounds and just have Brazil, Germany France and Italy straight into the semis.

Or screw Wimbledon, let's just do Djokovic vs Nadal or Federer....

Good post. What you say is pretty much what I feel -- Froch is a bit of a knob who comes out with salty crap a lot of the time when it comes to his own career, but he's on the money with the Whyte situation. What's fair and right is for the number one contender to get his shot if he's been waiting literally years.

[Monty Fisto]

Frock proves what biased hypocrite fangimps many british ex fighters/commentators are. He has the audacity to in the same breathe say Shyte is deserving of a title shot for his roided up robbery's yet call for Miller to be banned. British fanbois truly have no shame

Your own bias shows when the final conclusion of every drugs-testing agency involved was Whyte didn't dope and yet you describe him as roided up.

An objective view, unclouded by bias, would be to listen to UKAD and VADA, the professional judgement of both bodies being there was no wrongdoing.

[Eff Pandas]

Froch must owe Whyte money. No one gives a fook about Fury vs Whyte at this point. Fury vs AJ is The Fight to make at HW. This is a asses in seats sport & that's the fight that gets asses in seats.

[kushking]

Your own bias shows when the final conclusion of every drugs-testing agency involved was Whyte didn't dope and yet you describe him as roided up.

An objective view, unclouded by bias, would be to listen to UKAD and VADA, the professional judgement of both bodies being there was no wrongdoing.

I don't bother convincing uk fanbois anymore,if you want to believe Dbol can magically have gotten in Shytes system with no explanation whatsoever as to how the impossible happened & that Ukad is anything but as corrupt as can be,then thats your very very fanboi bias choice