Comments Thread For: Whyte Confident He'll Succeed Where Wilder Failed By Stopping Fury

[Get em up]

If Povetkin has one good night left and then he could do it.

I’m just not sure what he has left, he hasn’t looked that great since he come back from being caught doping. Hunter is a decent fighter, but I don’t think he would get a draw with or nearly beat a good version of Povetkin. he is starting to look 40

I agree with that completely. With that 1 good night and the way Whyte looked against Wach he definitely has a chance to pull it of.

[hugh grant]

Fight Joe Joyce and Dubois winner. If you win you get fury

[Jkp]

Notwithstanding the fact that resumes are generally judged by the content of the resume rather than the subjective quality of the actual performances; you still owe me a reply from nearly a month back. Since you are the forum's self-appointed expert on all things PED-related I'd be really appreciate your insights.










Can you educate me on the nuances of PED testing in sport please? I don't understand why Whyte's test producing an adverse finding in UKAD's testing but sailing through VADA's is somehow still indicative of UKAD's testing being less effective and stringent than VADA's. I look forward to you finally explaining how my conclusions are fundamentally flawed and clearing this up for me, since you have evidently conducted extensive research before commenting.

Thanks... Please actually reply this time.

Quote, only the blindest most naive UK fool, would believe Whyte is innocent.

You need to do some research about peds in sport.

http://www.steroids.info/2012/07/18/ukad-finally-catches-boxer-using-epo-after-steroids-and-hgh-use-for-six-years/

[Oshio]

I like the confidence Whyte exudes going into fights and scraping results against all odds and when nobody gives or favour him to win

[Redgloveman]

Quote, only the blindest most naive UK fool, would believe Whyte is innocent.

You need to do some research about peds in sport.
http://www.steroids.info/2012/07/18/...for-six-years/

Yes, you keep telling me that I need to "do some research"; how about you just tell me what you're driving at and answer my question? I said

"I don't understand why Whyte's test producing an adverse finding in UKAD's testing but sailing through VADA's is somehow still indicative of UKAD's testing being less effective and stringent than VADA's."

Can you explain this to me? You said that my conclusion was fundamentally flawed so presumably you can tell me why, since you're evidently an expert on PED testing regimes.

Sending me a news article about something (admittedly egregious) that happened 8 years ago to an extremely low-profile fighter isn't really an adequate response to what is a simple question.

So please ANSWER THE QUESTION. Thanks.