Can Whyte, Usyk, Pulev all the rest just GET LOST

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Earl-Hickey
    Banned
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Nov 2009
    • 29031
    • 2,832
    • 1,384
    • 297,750

    #1

    Can Whyte, Usyk, Pulev all the rest just GET LOST

    This is so annoying we have had no boxing for 6 months and now when a once in a decade undisputed fight comes along all these little grubs are getting in the way. Its just delaying it delaying it delaying it.

    Why do we need to see Fury school Whyte? Who wants to see that

    We aren't going to get an undisputed champion, something will happen one of them will get stripped or a shock loss and politics will ruin it

    Ffs
  • RoyJonesJrp4pno1
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • May 2005
    • 4617
    • 113
    • 4
    • 39,642

    #2
    These guys put their lives into boxing and want to fight the elite and make the most money.

    Besides, personally I don't care about the belts. Fury vs Joshua is 1 vs 2 regardless of what meaningless titles they're fighting for.

    Comment

    • removed
      Undisputed Champion
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Nov 2008
      • 21479
      • 4,005
      • 831
      • 164,542

      #3
      Originally posted by RoyJonesJrp4pno1
      Besides, personally I don't care about the belts. Fury vs Joshua is 1 vs 2 regardless of what meaningless titles they're fighting for.
      I completely agree, people put far too much stock into these abc belts/titles.

      Fury is #1, Joshua is #2. Just fight ffs.

      Comment

      • W1LL
        Celtic Warrior
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Dec 2004
        • 11851
        • 845
        • 916
        • 71,119

        #4
        Let's be honest lads, Tyson Fury is by far and away, clearly the #1 Heavyweight. Only a complete moron would dispute that. Wilder fans have been put in their place, we only have deluded AJ fans the only ones left trying to dispute reality. Everyone with a brain knows the Gypsy King reigns supreme. AJ would be a money fight for Tyson, but other than that it doesn't prove anything. Dillian Whyte is just as worthy of a shot at the Lineal title, and it is a fight I wouldn't mind watching. Fury would clown him and break him down with ease, that is a given, but Whyte talks too much and I'd like to see him shut up in brutal fashion. The Gypsy King is several levels above all three of AJ, Whyte and Wilder. Tyson can spend the rest of his career beating up on the bunch of them one after the other. Meanwhile those three can remain relevant by calling Tyson out and having their fanboys talking up their chances. If any of them lose in the meantime then they lose their place on the Tyson Fury gravy train. Reality is the competition is over and Tyson reigns until he retires.

        Comment

        • 'b'
          Delete account. TALMUD
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Nov 2017
          • 7105
          • 400
          • 481
          • 41,914

          #5
          To be fair they played by the rules, and rules are rules. They can either get paid step-aside money or the organisations can change the rules and be open to lawsuits.

          Comment

          • Citizen Koba
            Deplorable Peacenik
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Jun 2013
            • 20457
            • 3,951
            • 3,801
            • 2,875,273

            #6
            Nah, everyone deserves a shot. Being the Champ is meaningless without the ranking and mandatory system. I know it's fucked up and frustrating at times, and doesn't always give us the fights we want to see when we want to see 'em, but it's pretty much the only thing that legitimises the sport at all and the only barrier that prevents it becoming a free for all cash grab run by the dudes with the deepest pockets (and it's already little more than a fig leaf).

            Comment

            • removed
              Undisputed Champion
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Nov 2008
              • 21479
              • 4,005
              • 831
              • 164,542

              #7
              Originally posted by Citizen Koba
              Nah, everyone deserves a shot. Being the Champ is meaningless without the ranking and mandatory system. I know it's fucked up and frustrating at times, and doesn't always give us the fights we want to see when we want to see 'em, but it's pretty much the only thing that legitimises the sport at all and the only barrier that prevents it becoming a free for all cash grab run by the dudes with the deepest pockets (and it's already little more than a fig leaf).
              The abc rankings are a joke tho, corrupt as f***

              Comment

              • Citizen Koba
                Deplorable Peacenik
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Jun 2013
                • 20457
                • 3,951
                • 3,801
                • 2,875,273

                #8
                Originally posted by denium
                The abc rankings are a joke tho, corrupt as f***
                I can't disagree at all, but they're all we got. Take em away and it's a complete free for all... in fact a return to the chaos they were created to get rid of. It's a hugely flawed system but better than no system at all in my book.

                Comment

                • Inspired
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Aug 2019
                  • 2924
                  • 412
                  • 85
                  • 34,524

                  #9
                  Originally posted by W1LL
                  Let's be honest lads, Tyson Fury is by far and away, clearly the #1 Heavyweight. Only a complete moron would dispute that. Wilder fans have been put in their place, we only have deluded AJ fans the only ones left trying to dispute reality. Everyone with a brain knows the Gypsy King reigns supreme. AJ would be a money fight for Tyson, but other than that it doesn't prove anything. Dillian Whyte is just as worthy of a shot at the Lineal title, and it is a fight I wouldn't mind watching. Fury would clown him and break him down with ease, that is a given, but Whyte talks too much and I'd like to see him shut up in brutal fashion. The Gypsy King is several levels above all three of AJ, Whyte and Wilder. Tyson can spend the rest of his career beating up on the bunch of them one after the other. Meanwhile those three can remain relevant by calling Tyson out and having their fanboys talking up their chances. If any of them lose in the meantime then they lose their place on the Tyson Fury gravy train. Reality is the competition is over and Tyson reigns until he retires.
                  that was a cringe read.

                  'other than aj being a moneyfight, but it doesnt prove a lot'
                  lmfao...wtf are you even saying? you delusional cun+
                  it's a fight for UNDISPUTED.

                  Comment

                  • bluebeam
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Feb 2009
                    • 3839
                    • 121
                    • 0
                    • 31,012

                    #10
                    Originally posted by denium
                    I completely agree, people put far too much stock into these abc belts/titles.

                    Fury is #1, Joshua is #2. Just fight ffs.

                    The belts are important because if one man has them all, you cant become champion in that divison without going thru him.

                    Thats the defintion of a true champ. Then the fans get to see the champ fight every contender there is.

                    Undisputed eliminates ducks

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP