Is Crawford even better than Tim Bradley?

[QueensburyRules]

Bradley is better. Bradley was a 2nd thought in his era as pac was in prime at the time and crawford would also be 2nd thought in his era if Pac was 30 years old now.
But Crawford would be a greater win for pac now as he's 41. And Bradley was a great win for pac as pac achieved so much before facing Bradley and still rose to occasion

- -Manny mid 30s as a part time fighter werent prime, but oddly has allowed him to extend out his legend.

No matter how they want to slice it, Spence damaged goods, we just don't know how badly.

Crawford a bad little motor scooter a nasty piece of work in and out of the ring and a lot hungrier for what they got than they for him.

Manny should stick with Spence in a splashier international media event and retire win, a decent probability, lose, Spence a slight fav, or draw, always possible in Vegas to set up lucrative rematches.

[John Locke]

Well Bradley actually fought and beat some top level guys, so he's definitely more proven, we'll see how good Bud is if he ever steps up the competition

[boliodogs]

Bradley has beaten: Peterson, Alexander, Marquez, Vargas, Casamayor, Holt, Witter, Vazquez, etc. No one had ever beaten him except Pacquiao.

Is Terrence Crawford even better than Tim Bradley? And if so by how much?

Because Pacquiao destroyed Bradley and retired him.

I think Bradley was good and Crawford is better. The fight Bdadley won over Pac i consider a Bradley loss and gave Pac 10 of the 12 rounds. During his entire career I don't remember Bradley ever being on the top 10 best pound for pound lists. If he ever was it was at number 9 or 10 and no higher. Crawford has been at or near the top of all pound for pound best lists for a few years now.If they fought I think Crawford would win most of the rounds but Bradley would put up a good fight in my opinion. Crawford would be a clear winner but Bradley is rugged and would probably not be KOed.

[RuleOfTheSpear]

Crawford has yet to step up.

[IceTrayDaGang]

The bold: As Uncle Roger would say, YDKSAB. I'm sure you've heard that several times before.

bradley shiiet all over crawford's resume...

[aboutfkntime]

Bradley has beaten: Peterson, Alexander, Marquez, Vargas, Casamayor, Holt, Witter, Vazquez, etc. No one had ever beaten him except Pacquiao.

Is Terrence Crawford even better than Tim Bradley? And if so by how much?

Because Pacquiao destroyed Bradley and retired him.

yes, he is... I would favor him head-to-head, both at 140 and 147

but Bradley has a better resume, and would go down as a better fighter if Crawford retired today

bud still has some work to do

Bradley was excellent

[Thraxox]

Well, basically Bradley would have certainly beaten everyone that Crawford fought. But would Crawford beat everyone Bradley fought?

[Dip_Slide]

Judging by the eye test Crawford looks to be better, but resumewise Bradley takes it.

[Squ□redCircle34]

The only people who would think bradley was ever better then crawford are just people who hate crawford or pacfans looking to inflate pacs record as always. To them bradley is a atg. I remember a prime Bradley telling a story of sparring a young green crawford who he himself said beat the sht out of him.......

Bradley was past his prime at that point I believe!

[hugh grant]

Well Bradley actually fought and beat some top level guys, so he's definitely more proven, we'll see how good Bud is if he ever steps up the competition

I'm en visaging if Pac beat crawford people would be saying who did Crawford fight and beat.? People couldn't really say that when Pac beat bradley.
So that's what I mean when I say Bradley's better. Who would win is anyone's guess, if Crawford beat Bradley it wouldn't exactly shock me.