Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Sparring Partner: I Heard Pacquiao Had Amir Khan Asleep on Floor!

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    Originally posted by Angeljuice View Post
    Firsthand means you witnessed it, knowing someone who did isn't first hand.
    Thanks for stating what I had already done. Some definitions do include it to be the latter as well which is why I put it down AFTER the part where you witnessed it yourself.

    Comment


    • #42
      A thread a guy hearing a thing? How boxing scene lol

      Comment


      • #43
        Is this meant to be shocking news or something?

        To be fair to Khan he chased the Pacquiao fight and Pacquiao ran away - Maybe Paq did put Khan to sleep but Khan had the bigger balls.

        Floyd ran away too after promising Khan a fight and even after Khan won his Twitter poll for next opponent. I guess Khan is a lot scarier than he looks!

        Comment


        • #44
          Originally posted by Truth Serum View Post
          No one bought into Manny vs Khan as if we didn't already know Khan would of slept right about round 4.

          Unskilled Bradley? Dude only lost to a man many people on earth label the GOAT.
          You do realize Bradley ducked Khan too? Only resume more weaker than FMJs is that of TBJs.

          Comment


          • #45
            khan has a glass jaw that he routinely leaves exposed

            Pacquaio has big power (especially in 2008), high speed and unorthodox angles


            doesnt take a rocket science to figure out the rumors of Khan getting sparked out are likely true.


            Also the fighter telling this story may not have seen it but he has sparred BOTH and wouldnt be retelling the story if he didnt think it was highly likely to be true based on his first hand experience in the ring with both fighters.

            Comment


            • #46
              Originally posted by Silver Spear View Post
              Thanks for stating what I had already done. Some definitions do include it to be the latter as well which is why I put it down AFTER the part where you witnessed it yourself.
              You can have a first hand account from somebody who was there, but you wouldn't be experiencing the thing first hand.

              Sorry, I wasn't being a #@*&, I had to think about it for awhile. It isn't as simple as it seems at first as a "first hand account" can be read by anybody, and still considered first hand as such.

              Anyway, it took me back to my University days so I had to contemplate it long and hard and was just reporting my conclusion to you.

              No offense meant, it just made me think.
              Last edited by Angeljuice; 06-25-2020, 04:23 AM.

              Comment

              Working...
              X
              TOP