Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Fury or Joshua?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #81
    Fury of course. Is that even a question? I can`t imagine Fury losing to somebody like Ruiz.

    Comment


    • #82
      Originally posted by JakeTheBoxer View Post
      Fury of course. Is that even a question? I can`t imagine Fury losing to somebody like Ruiz.
      - -We easily imagine U gaining Fury 400lbs in front of U keyboard.

      Comment


      • #83
        Originally posted by RJJ-94-02=GOAT View Post
        busted...
        Best thing is, you know you’re wrong. Fury couldn’t go toe to toe with Wlad. Wlad would have KO’d him easily.

        So I gave concession that Fury nullified Wlad but you’re too ignorant to concede that Wlad would have KO’d him, if Wlad threw.

        What a dumba$$.

        Comment


        • #84
          Originally posted by OnlytheTruth View Post
          Wlad would have KO’d him easily.
          Did you even watch the fight?

          Fury didn’t allow Wlad to throw, how do you not understand that.

          YDKSAB...

          Comment


          • #85
            Originally posted by RJJ-94-02=GOAT View Post
            Did you even watch the fight?

            Fury didn’t allow Wlad to throw, how do you not understand that.

            YDKSAB...
            Once again, you show you have no brain.

            I already said that so you either cannot read or you’re brain dead.

            You’ve actually demonstrated that it’s you that knows nothing about boxing...and reading.

            Comment


            • #86
              Originally posted by OnlytheTruth View Post
              Once again, you show you have no brain.

              I already said that so you either cannot read or you’re brain dead.

              You’ve actually demonstrated that it’s you that knows nothing about boxing...and reading.
              You don’t have a clue kid...

              You’re a fanboy who can’t separate wishful thinking from reality.

              “If Wlad would have let his hands go he would have done this and that blah blah blah... Just stop with that BS! He had 12 rounds to do so, but Fury didn’t allow him to. That’s how boxing works dumbass. You take away your opponents best assets. Wlad could barely lay a glove on him, yet “if he let his hands go he would have easily knocked him out”, what f***ing planet are you on?

              I’m done with this little pr***, so you’re going on ignore, waste your own time all you want writing some BS reply. I’m not going to read it and you won’t get another reply from me.

              More like OnlytheLies...

              Comment


              • #87
                Originally posted by OnlytheTruth View Post
                Best thing is, you know you’re wrong. Fury couldn’t go toe to toe with Wlad. Wlad would have KO’d him easily.

                So I gave concession that Fury nullified Wlad but you’re too ignorant to concede that Wlad would have KO’d him, if Wlad threw.

                What a dumba$$.
                Which is it fury nullified wlad or wlad chose not to throw???

                Comment


                • #88
                  Only casuals say

                  "If Wlad only let his hands go he would've won the fight"

                  Anyone who has studied Wlad knows that he liked to fight in a construct and was very reluctant to let his hands go if he didn't feel like his footwork was in the correct position. Its a reason why he has looked sub-par against anyone with decent footwork, Jennings, Thompson, Ibragimov etc.

                  Fury knew this, and thus used footwork and fients to completely neutralise his offence.

                  His style was all wrong for Wlad. Joshua on the other hand, came forward in straight lines, no head movement and no fients, and that's why Wlad had a lot more success with him.

                  OnlyTheTwat is just displaying his lack of boxing knowledge as usual.

                  Comment


                  • #89
                    Originally posted by *TonyMontana* View Post
                    Which is it fury nullified wlad or wlad chose not to throw???
                    Fury nullified Wlad.

                    Its common sense that if Fury didn't nullify Wlad, Wlad would have been throwing big punches and would have put Fury out.

                    Comment


                    • #90
                      Originally posted by RJJ-94-02=GOAT View Post
                      You don’t have a clue kid...

                      You’re a fanboy who can’t separate wishful thinking from reality.

                      “If Wlad would have let his hands go he would have done this and that blah blah blah... Just stop with that BS! He had 12 rounds to do so, but Fury didn’t allow him to. That’s how boxing works dumbass. You take away your opponents best assets. Wlad could barely lay a glove on him, yet “if he let his hands go he would have easily knocked him out”, what f***ing planet are you on?

                      I’m done with this little pr***, so you’re going on ignore, waste your own time all you want writing some BS reply. I’m not going to read it and you won’t get another reply from me.

                      More like OnlytheLies...
                      Another Fury fanatic brainless c*** who can't read.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP