What (if anything) makes Tom Schwarz and Otto Wallin "poor opposition"?

[STREET CLEANER]

Unknown opponents that they dug up because their undefeated records.

Can't prop them up because their resume is really weak. What they do after their loss is what is going to define them.

But know boxing scene both guys loose bad in their next fight and they will say that Fury took their souls.

[Ray*]

We would see what they both achieve from now on, obviously they were both unknown and haven't really fought anyone of note. Wallin especially could be one to look out for. But right now they aren't anything to write home about. If Wilder or Joshua picked them to fight them they would have been destroyed by every single knowledgeable boxing fan. But am sure Tom and Otto can change the perception of the avid boxing fan.

[soul_survivor]

This is the opinion we often heard expressed by Tyson Fury haters. But what is so bad about these two opponents? Both solid, European-level opponents, both with potential to go on and become World contenders. Both were also unbeaten. Even as tune-up fights Fury got criticism from some quarters.

Can someone rank Schwarz and Wallin alongside the following fighters, who got World title shots in recent times. Are they better or worse wins? Why?

Dominic Breazeale
Johann Duhaupas
Eric Molina
Luis Ortiz
Artur Szpilka
Carlos Takam

Can anyone tell me what this list have acheived that make them much better opponents than Tom Schwarz and Otto Wallin? Or is it just hype?

If you trash Schwarz and Wallin, why?

cmoooon fella!

You like Fury, I say he is a pretty good fighter but there's no need to go full ******.

[Marchegiano]

12-3

Fury

7-8

sad