When is Anthony Joshua's IBF Mandaotry due?

[Shadoww702]

Fury didn’t need to sign a rematch clause to fight Wlad. He was the WBA/WBO mandatory. He did so to get a voluntary agreement for more money. That has nothing to do with the IBF

Sergey rank #3 beat Culcay rank #2 to become the #1 IBF challenger in March 2019. He was dropped to #3 after the Jacob’s split decision in 2018 which is pretty fair. He worked his way up the rankings to get his shot

Going 1-1 should not make you #1 so quick. He’s like that Chaz guy from UFC with a bunch of losses in title fights all the time. But ohh well Kovalov was an actual champ ranked at the time P4P #18. Sergiy has NEVER won a belt.

The other part lie to yourself but don’t lie to me... I’ll provide many links if needed.


“In order to get the title shot against Klitschko, Fury was required to sign a rematch clause in the event he won the fight. That meant that it would be Klitschko's option if the two would fight again in the wake of a Fury victory. And last week, Klitschko exercised his contractual right to the fight. If Fury went ahead with the fight with Glazkov, Klitschko would have sued and likely been able to prevent the bout.“

[Shadoww702]

Fury didn’t need to sign a rematch clause to fight Wlad. He was the WBA/WBO mandatory. He did so to get a voluntary agreement for more money. That has nothing to do with the IBF

Sergey rank #3 beat Culcay rank #2 to become the #1 IBF challenger in March 2019. He was dropped to #3 after the Jacob’s split decision in 2018 which is pretty fair. He worked his way up the rankings to get his shot

I’m not trying to be rude but 99% when you fight a A side they have rematch clauses.

Heck Fury has to fight Wilder because of a clause.

You will get stripped and sued if don’t do it.

[REDEEMER]

The IBF rules state they will go next in line ,they aren't going to have an elimination bout with 2 weeks to go ,that's ridiculous. Their own rules say they can mandate anyone who is readily available ,another weird thread about A.J , on top of this Pulev pulled out against him at least twice ,they arent just going to hand him a title fight so they made him fight Hughie for it . Team Joshua has been in compliance and in contact with them all along so dont lose sleep over it . Ha

[techliam]

Going 1-1 should not make you #1 so quick. He’s like that Chaz guy from UFC with a bunch of losses in title fights all the time. But ohh well Kovalov was an actual champ ranked at the time P4P #18. Sergiy has NEVER won a belt.

The other part lie to yourself but don’t lie to me... I’ll provide many links if needed.


“In order to get the title shot against Klitschko, Fury was required to sign a rematch clause in the event he won the fight. That meant that it would be Klitschko's option if the two would fight again in the wake of a Fury victory. And last week, Klitschko exercised his contractual right to the fight. If Fury went ahead with the fight with Glazkov, Klitschko would have sued and likely been able to prevent the bout.“

Well, it's up to you to decide where you think Sergey should have been ranked after losing to Jacobs by SD. I think rank 3 is fair. If you don't, then that's fair also as we're all entitled to opinions. There wasn't a rank 1 at the time in the IBF so his title shot came quicker than normal for someone dropped to number 3

[techliam]

I’m not trying to be rude but 99% when you fight a A side they have rematch clauses.

Heck Fury has to fight Wilder because of a clause.

You will get stripped and sued if don’t do it.

Rematch clauses only apply in contracts voluntary agreed to by both sides

Fury could have forced purse bids against Wlad, as he was the mandatory for both the WBA/WBO, and not have to sign a rematch clause. But he would have only been entitled to the challengers official (WBA) purse split, which I think is 30%, could be lower. Either way, they came to voluntary agreement where Fury was paid more but had to sign the rematch clause. The IBF would have let his management know that a mandatory was due after this fight well in advance

[Shadoww702]

Rematch clauses only apply in contracts voluntary agreed to by both sides

Fury could have forced purse bids against Wlad, as he was the mandatory for both the WBA/WBO, and not have to sign a rematch clause. But he would have only been entitled to the challengers official (WBA) purse split, which I think is 30%, could be lower. Either way, they came to voluntary agreement where Fury was paid more but had to sign the rematch clause. The IBF would have let his management know that a mandatory was due after this fight well in advance

You think the WBA/WBO would of stripped Klitz???

[techliam]

You think the WBA/WBO would of stripped Klitz???

They would have had to strip him if Fury went that far. Like you said, someone would be sued, and it would be the organisations - they are the ones with sanctioning responsibilities for the fighters

The WBA had had their fair share of legal issues

The WBO are notoriously close to Warren so I wouldn't be surprised

But it never got that far. Yes Fury was in a difficult position - accept less money, or a rematch clause. But at the end of the day, he would still have 2 titles and a bigger payday, so who blames him? It wasn't the fault of the IBF

[Shadoww702]

They would have had to strip him if Fury went that far. Like you said, someone would be sued, and it would be the organisations - they are the ones with sanctioning responsibilities for the fighters

The WBA had had their fair share of legal issues

The WBO are notoriously close to Warren so I wouldn't be surprised

But it never got that far. Yes Fury was in a difficult position - accept less money, or a rematch clause. But at the end of the day, he would still have 2 titles and a bigger payday, so who blames him? It wasn't the fault of the IBF

If you say so. What lottery numbers should I take today???