Whose “2nd’ary Champ win” is better, Canelo vs Fielding, or GGG vs Jacobs?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Thuglife Nelo
    Banned
    • Dec 2018
    • 26836
    • 1,299
    • 1,822
    • 654,176

    #1

    Whose “2nd’ary Champ win” is better, Canelo vs Fielding, or GGG vs Jacobs?

    Both Canelo and GGG fought secondary champs in Fielding and Jacobs. Fielding was undefeated and beat Ryder. Jacobs got sparked by Pirog. Canelo’s win over Jacobs was more badass than Lil’Gs attempt.

    Therefore by the power vested in me I says Fielding vs Jacobs must happen to settle scores.

    And that’s all she wrote!
  • _Rexy_
    Undisputed Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Jan 2018
    • 27929
    • 6,140
    • 3,585
    • 358,040

    #2
    Considering the fact that Canelo felt the need to put a hydration clause on Jacobs at 160, after having just fought at 168 tells you all you need to know.


    And Fielding wasn't undefeated. He had been KO1'd against Callum Smith

    Comment

    • JohnCastellanos
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Apr 2018
      • 2800
      • 127
      • 184
      • 125,754

      #3
      Originally posted by _Rexy_
      Considering the fact that Canelo felt the need to put a hydration clause on Jacobs at 160, after having just fought at 168 tells you all you need to know.


      And Fielding wasn't undefeated. He had been KO1'd against Callum Smith
      Bro gggs fight had a rehydration clause as well but jacobs decided to skip gggs. Canelo was smart enough to put a monetary penalty on that. Not a good example

      Comment

      • mxtali
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Aug 2017
        • 2145
        • 433
        • 986
        • 34,126

        #4
        Obviously Jacobs, Fielding isn’t anywhere close to the caliber of DJ.

        Comment

        • _Rexy_
          Undisputed Champion
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Jan 2018
          • 27929
          • 6,140
          • 3,585
          • 358,040

          #5
          Originally posted by JohnCastellanos
          Bro gggs fight had a rehydration clause as well but jacobs decided to skip gggs. Canelo was smart enough to put a monetary penalty on that. Not a good example
          It’s a perfect example. Canelo had just fought at 168 but still needed to drain Jacobs at 160.

          Comment

          • Thuglife Nelo
            Banned
            • Dec 2018
            • 26836
            • 1,299
            • 1,822
            • 654,176

            #6
            Originally posted by _Rexy_
            Considering the fact that Canelo felt the need to put a hydration clause on Jacobs at 160, after having just fought at 168 tells you all you need to know.


            And Fielding wasn't undefeated. He had been KO1'd against Callum Smith
            Jacobs proved he didn’t care about clauses since he forfeited the IBF with GGG. Therefore, GBP played Jacobs’ bluff knowing he’d probably do it against Canelo. It was Jacobs’ money. If Jacobs made 15mil then how much was Danny willing to give up!? Lol “rehydration clause”

            Comment

            • Ritz Kola
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Aug 2019
              • 1017
              • 58
              • 60
              • 19,591

              #7
              CLEBUTEROL ALVAREZ:
              King of rehydrated to semi truck status
              King of catch weights
              King of rehydration clauses
              King of French fries champs

              Comment

              • TonyGe
                Undisputed Champion
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Dec 2016
                • 11867
                • 379
                • 149
                • 173,865

                #8
                Originally posted by Mexican Bidness
                Both Canelo and GGG fought secondary champs in Fielding and Jacobs. Fielding was undefeated and beat Ryder. Jacobs got sparked by Pirog. Canelo’s win over Jacobs was more badass than Lil’Gs attempt.

                Therefore by the power vested in me I says Fielding vs Jacobs must happen to settle scores.

                And that’s all she wrote!
                The hell with that. I want to see Fielding vs Rolls. Danny would beat Fielding no doubt.

                Comment

                • TonyGe
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Dec 2016
                  • 11867
                  • 379
                  • 149
                  • 173,865

                  #9
                  Originally posted by JohnCastellanos
                  Bro gggs fight had a rehydration clause as well but jacobs decided to skip gggs. Canelo was smart enough to put a monetary penalty on that. Not a good example
                  There was no re-hydration clause in the contract for the Golovkin fight. Danny gave up his chance to win the IBF title from Golovkin to avoid their mandatory re-hydrataion limit.

                  Comment

                  • boliodogs
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • May 2008
                    • 33358
                    • 824
                    • 1,782
                    • 309,589

                    #10
                    You get ******er and a bigger Canelo lover and GGG hater with each new change of user names. Fielding WAS NOT UNDEFEATED when he fought Canelo, He had been knocked out in the first round by Callum Smith before he fought Canelo. Callum Smith was the real 168 pound champion and the man Canelo should have fought. He fought 14 to 1 underdog Fall Down Fielding instead. You try to come off like a boxing expert but you are just a fool who doesn't know what you are talking about.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP