I just gave to a link where Whyte chose to fight Del Bum over Breazeale. Yes Whyte eventually agreed to fight Breazeale but Whyte turned down the Breazeale fight the first time he was given the opportunity. If he wanted the mando spot he should’ve fought Breazeale or ortiz before Del bum
Comments Thread For: Dillian Whyte: Wilder Is Injured; WBC Should Order Fury To Fight Me Next
Collapse
-
-
Yup and why he want to fight Del Boy? Because he wanted that PPV money.I just gave to a link where Whyte chose to fight Del Bum over Breazeale. Yes Whyte eventually agreed to fight Breazeale but Whyte turned down the Breazeale fight the first time he was given the opportunity. If he wanted the mando spot he should’ve fought Breazeale or ortiz before Del bum
Whyte is a fraud and has successfully fooled the boxing casuals into thinking he's some poor hard done guy, well done to him.Comment
-
Comment
-
Ukad is funded by the fighters who use it. So yes they look after there customers who pay the bills. It gets handouts from government too. But not a government organization.
Ukad didn't have money to fight fury cases, which is why they got off so lightly. That could have bankrupted ukad .
Remember whytes failed test was leaked. There might be 100's of others fighters with dianabol in there samples due to contamination, but we would never hear about it.
Exactly this
Then why not divulge the information , especially since he’s not guilty , to the Rivas camp ?
Why keep it on the hush ?
There’s just to many ??? for this to be all on the up and upComment
-
I feel for the guy but he's avoided his mandatories before which lead to this.
Wilder being injured doesn't mean a thing. Other fighters been injured and they postponed fights and not forced the belt holder to fight another ranked opponent. That's why there's contracts. Plus no one is fighting now and wilder will be healed before his next fight.
I want a unification as well but who ever wins between wilder and fury should then have to fight Whyte.Comment
-
Keep in mind that statement was a JOINT statement from UKAD and Whyte's legal team. It had to be approved by both.I understand what you are saying but under strict liability the contamination of a supplement would still have been a fail and then they would have a hearing to look at mitigating factors to reduce the ban from the normal tariff. It seems clear that there was never any substance in his system which is why the statement was put out like that by UKAD and why there were no charges. You have to remember that the statement mentions other tests that were done at the same time and basically it must have been impossible for any metabolites to have come from Whyte due to the levels etc.
The possibility of contamination was accepted because of his VADA tests. Hearn himself said the VADA tests were a huge part of the evidence to exonerate Whyte and that without the VADA tests he would have been in real trouble. The VADA tests are what got him off.
Those levels were actually HIGHER than the metabolite levels of the banned substance found in Canelo, who got banned.
Whyte was represented by the same lawyer who got Tyson Fury off and nearly bankrupted UKAD from their legal battle.
A few reporters wrote about this, that UKAD was in fear that Whyte would also bankrupt them - because his lawyers threatened that if they prove Whyte ingested something contaminated then they would sue for all of the paydays he missed out on.Comment
-
Keep in mind that statement was a JOINT statement from UKAD and Whyte's legal team. It had to be approved by both.
The possibility of contamination was accepted because of his VADA tests. Hearn himself said the VADA tests were a huge part of the evidence to exonerate Whyte and that without the VADA tests he would have been in real trouble. The VADA tests are what got him off.
Those levels were actually HIGHER than the metabolite levels of the banned substance found in Canelo, who got banned.
Whyte was represented by the same lawyer who got Tyson Fury off and nearly bankrupted UKAD from their legal battle.
A few reporters wrote about this, that UKAD was in fear that Whyte would also bankrupt them - because his lawyers threatened that if they prove Whyte ingested something contaminated then they would sue for all of the paydays he missed out on.
So more or less , he wasn’t pushed to prove it cause 5hey were scared of not having the financial means to fight it
Did I get it right ?
Cause that would explain the backpedalingComment
-
Even if Wilder gets injured Whyte would NOT get his mandatory shot until Fury has fought Wilder again first. If Whyte pulls off the miracle and beats Fury then Wilder would have NO where to go but either fight Whyte or Joshua or retirement. And Honestly he would rather retire.Comment
-
Sounds a lot like rumour and conjecture from reporters to me. The UKAD bankruptcy theory is a red herring and as I said in another post was just UKAD's vocal begging bowl as the UK government approached the end of a review into their funding. It was an alarmist but ultimately successful tactic that ensured they were granted a further £6.1m in funding over two years. Remember Tyson was ultimately banned for 2 years. They didn't back down from him, they banned him, and however it happened and however much he has spun the story he was out of the ring for 2 years.Keep in mind that statement was a JOINT statement from UKAD and Whyte's legal team. It had to be approved by both.
The possibility of contamination was accepted because of his VADA tests. Hearn himself said the VADA tests were a huge part of the evidence to exonerate Whyte and that without the VADA tests he would have been in real trouble. The VADA tests are what got him off.
Those levels were actually HIGHER than the metabolite levels of the banned substance found in Canelo, who got banned.
Whyte was represented by the same lawyer who got Tyson Fury off and nearly bankrupted UKAD from their legal battle.
A few reporters wrote about this, that UKAD was in fear that Whyte would also bankrupt them - because his lawyers threatened that if they prove Whyte ingested something contaminated then they would sue for all of the paydays he missed out on.
I'm confused that you are talking about higher levels of metabolites of a different substance than Canelo whilst also referencing and acknowledging the existence of other contemporaneous VADA tests that conclusively prove that no matter how low the metabolites reportedly in a sample could not have been there due to any form of doping. You say that the VADA tests got him off and that is likely to be true. Were these fake tests or were they part of his proof of innocence? This was the outcome of an extensive investigation by UKAD which is ultimately operating under the almost unlimited resources of not only the UK Government but also WADA.
Effectively you would seemingly rather believe journalistic rumour and subscribe to fanciful international conspiracy theories or threat and corruption than accept that the extensive investigation by UKAD found that not only was he innocent but that also they didn't even have enough to charge him. On the contrary they had conclusive evidence to exonerate him based on the burden of him proving his innocence - which he did.Last edited by Counterleft; 05-31-2020, 02:43 PM.Comment

Comment