Wikipedia highlight for GGG is Steve Rolls, for Canelo its Mayweather

[Thuglife Nelo]

Even gggs box rec is questionable. You have to look a little deaper to see that most of his titles were vacant. Unlike Canelos who even his WBC which Cotto vacated the day of the fight, that title was listed as a vacant title. Sounds to me like an attempt to make Golovkin appear more legit

That’s not important. The most chilling fight everz is GGG’s first pro fight. Look at his opponent and ask yourself if that guy was on medication or needed to take a dump cause that’s the most tight and skiddiest hopping around I hassa everz seen. For a Silver Medalist and an opponent with 100 losses GGG should be ashamed of himself... tsk tsk

[JohnCastellanos]

That’s not important. The most chilling fight everz is GGG’s first pro fight. Look at his opponent and ask yourself if that guy was on medication or needed to take a dump cause that’s the most tight and skiddiest hopping around I hassa everz seen. For a Silver Medalist and an opponent with 100 losses GGG should be ashamed of himself... tsk tsk

Looking at gggs box rec is like going to a comedy show!

[TonyGe]

I found this quite odd that, are wikipedia deliberately tryingf to make GGG look bad?

Also wikipedia entry for GGG has massive amounts of detail in several paragraphs for bums like Rolls, of the kind that are never mentioned in Canelo's entry.


There may be an attempt to make GGG look bad.

You making this up. Highlights from the Mayweather fight?? I haven't seen the article but I can't imagine Wiki would be so cruel as to show highlights from one of the most humiliating ass kickings a so called professional fighter suffered in recent memory. I hope they didn't include the rumors that Canelo's family refused to leave the house for fear of public ridicule after that fiasco. You must have cried yourself to sleep.

[stealthradon]

Lol. Again my theory is proven that PAC/GGG fans always crying about Canelo. When Floyd beat PAC the GGG fanbase came from PAC. That explains all the Argentinian alts on this site.

But to add to your citation. Wikipedia DOES NEED to revise that bit and say “Canelo is the first boxer to ever knock Baldomor dA fUQ out!”

Who the hell is Baldomor?

[Citizen Koba]

I found this quite odd that, are wikipedia deliberately tryingf to make GGG look bad?

Also wikipedia entry for GGG has massive amounts of detail in several paragraphs for bums like Rolls, of the kind that are never mentioned in Canelo's entry.


There may be an attempt to make GGG look bad.

Wikipedia is just people man. You do understand how wikis work yeah?

Anyone could have put that in. You could have put that in man. Ain't like there's a shortage of obsessives putting in the hours to try to credit or discredit Golovkin now is there?

[stealthradon]

That’s not important. The most chilling fight everz is GGG’s first pro fight. Look at his opponent and ask yourself if that guy was on medication or needed to take a dump cause that’s the most tight and skiddiest hopping around I hassa everz seen. For a Silver Medalist and an opponent with 100 losses GGG should be ashamed of himself... tsk tsk

Still has two more wins than Canelo's first two pro fights combined..

[Thuglife Nelo]

Who the hell is Baldomor?

An Argentinian Sorcerer that ******ed trolls and got knocked out by Caneloro from deleted scenes in LOTR 2

[Citizen Koba]

It's weird how there is an influx of Golovkin threads/posts when certain posters are active.

Mr Dream Fighter here is basically obsessed, few others on here too. You just got to look at their post and thread histories. I mean there's literally 70 or 80% of their output just about Golovkin, that's waay more that even his most dedicated fans.

Bizarre innit? Gotta wonder what drives someone to that. I think it is fair to say that if success can be measured by the amount of work people put in to discrediting you then Golovkins done very well indeed.

[DreamFighter]

Wikipedia is just people man. You do understand how wikis work yeah?

Anyone could have put that in. You could have put that in man. Ain't like there's a shortage of obsessives putting in the hours to try to discredit Golovkin now is there?

certainly no shortage of obsessives calling out GGG-support as an attempt to discredit him, seeing as this thread question is 100% worded to support of GGG.

thanks for demonstrating that.

[Thuglife Nelo]

Bizarre innit? Gotta wonder what drives someone to that. I think it is fair to say that if success can be measured by the amount of work people put in to discrediting you then Golovkins done very well indeed.

Golovkin’s just a boxer that got punked by Canelo. Call it “GGG was old or scorecards this...” but the performances by both showed Canelo don’t fool around. You don’t say anything about Canelo hate threads but you’re always defensive or have something to say if I raise doubt for intentional use with Canelo. I mean what “drives” you to defend GGG? Let others have fun and stfu. . It’s a boxing forum and these screenames won’t live forever