Originally posted by Randall Cunning
View Post
Sunday Times usually give the most conservative estimates and this year they published that AJ made £58M ($72M). Funny how last year Sunday Times said AJ made £20M (or so) and Forbes claimed he made $55M and that's because he fought once against Povetkin. But this year when he fought twice (one in a huge lucrative fight and was paid over $32M in the other) and his endorsements rose to £32M - they're claiming he made less money than last year. LMAO.
What he made from the PPV for the Ruiz rematch alone is over £20M (Ruiz was paid by DAZN) and what the PPV from that fight grossed is higher than what Fury vs Wilder did with the fake numbers they spammed everywhere. Once you add the ridiculous site fee - he made more than the Forbes fake net worth for Fury and Wilder combined from that fight alone.
It's pretty obvious they don't want him to be up there as the highest paid athlete in the world in the calender year since he made more money than Ronaldo and Messi combined. Or how would it look if the athlete they love to hate tops their list with over $150M?
Also, Fury and Wilder didn't make anything close to the fake numbers they posted up there. Wilder didn't even make $10M from the Ortiz fight - the fight sold less than 100k PPV. And Both Wilder and Fury didn't make more than $15M in their rematch.
Funny how Fury didn't make the Sunday Times list but on Forbes, he's the richest. LMAOOO.
Comment