Hating on both Tysons

[Marchegiano]

Tyson Fury:

"How many defenses has he made"

---

Fine criticism

---


Mike Tyson:

"Who did he beat"

---

Also a fine criticism

---



However, I feel like one asking how many defenses Fury has ought to be a Mike fan given Mike has more undisputed defenses than any HW in the three belt era is the the third most defended undisputed HW champion of all time. Only Luis and Ali have more...you know, those two fellas one everyone's top ten.


Inversely, how can you ask who Mike beat and not recognize Fury's resume? If resume is your thing, Fury ought to be your man given he is the only man to beat reigning defending champions who held onto their title for longer than 2 defenses.


Either you respect resume or you don't. Either defenses mean something or they don't. Picking and choosing what to respect and what to criticize per individual just makes you a ****, ya ****.



It's a bit sad. Seems to come from Joshua fans. The Josh fans are used to Joshua being the most popular, but all Mike needs to do is hit some ****ing mitts and Josh takes a backseat to the old man.

Josh was seen as the man with the best resume and highest skill set for a while, then he got battered by a fatty while Fury KO'd the KO king.

Dude's not as famous or respected as his current counterparts and I suspect that has much more to do with the recent Mike/Fury hate than the actual criticisms.

The only men who defended their crown against a long list of competitors and has a resume are from the golden era ya mooks, hence golden era. Ali, Frazier, maybe Holmes if you count him. Foreman didn't even get a high number of defenses.

Guys with resume tend to have less defenses. Lennox has 0 undisputed defenses

Guys with defenses tend to have less resume. Wlad has 0 resume wins


Guys with both are named Ali.


Stop being ****ing ****s, pick a lane and stay there. Ya ****s.

[REDEEMER]

Where do you fit in then one of Furys biggest haters posting things like this ?

“I thought he'd walk right through the feather fisted **** the first go so the **** do I know?”

“That said, he walks right through that ***** Fury. Tyson has no pop, other than missing Wilder's got nothing to fear.”


Why would Holmes be considered more then Foreman who you referred to as a non defending champion but you Ali is the guy you suped up ,isn’t Foreman supposed to lose ? Holmes didn’t fight anyone up until 1978 . It’s a golden era based on 2 guys , Frazier and Ali who didnt rematch until years apart and one was past his best more then the other .

Frazier himself did not defend the title but a handful of times and everyone lost to each other but when it happens in this era they are bums .

Klitschko has no resume wins what ? And your here talking about hate ,one of the more pointless posters on here again.

[Canelo and GGG]

I think that its coming to the fact that people dont wanna see Fury as a champion as a face of HW devision ,A fat gipsy beats people that looks like real athletes ,they feel like its embarrasing for boxing , AJ in many ppl's eyes is what champion should be ,allways in the perfect shape and humble , Fury is this ugly child of boxing.

[RJJ-94-02=GOAT]

Joshua fans are just weirdo’s...

[Marchegiano]

I think that its coming to the fact that people dont wanna see Fury as a champion as a face of HW devision ,A fat gipsy beats people that looks like real athletes ,they feel like its embarrasing for boxing , AJ in many ppl's eyes is what champion should be ,allways in the perfect shape and humble , Fury is this ugly child of boxing.

Well goddamn that is a fine explanation I honestly didn't consider. Fury is an ugly ****. Absolutely no issue with me, but, it is true. Far as looks goes Joshua does look great.

[Marchegiano]

Where do you fit in then one of Furys biggest haters posting things like this ?

“I thought he'd walk right through the feather fisted **** the first go so the **** do I know?”

“That said, he walks right through that ***** Fury. Tyson has no pop, other than missing Wilder's got nothing to fear.”


Why would Holmes be considered more then Foreman who you referred to as a non defending champion but you Ali is the guy you suped up ,isn’t Foreman supposed to lose ? Holmes didn’t fight anyone up until 1978 . It’s a golden era based on 2 guys , Frazier and Ali who didnt rematch until years apart and one was past his best more then the other .

Frazier himself did not defend the title but a handful of times and everyone lost to each other but when it happens in this era they are bums .

Klitschko has no resume wins what ? And your here talking about hate ,one of the more pointless posters on here again.

You're all over the place bud. Wipe the foam from your mouth and organize your thoughts next time.


--
Q:

Where do you fit in then one of Furys biggest haters posting things like this ?

--
A:

Where do I fit in? I was wrong. I've admitted it several times. What else do you want from me? I thought Fury would be scared to punch hard and would go with light taps.....it's not a big deal. Literally to anyone here but you. I was wrong about something once.

--
Q:

Why would Holmes be considered more then Foreman who you referred to as a non defending champion but you Ali is the guy you suped up ,isn’t Foreman supposed to lose ?

--
A:

The **** are you talking about? I pointed out if and thens and spoke to consistency. IF you like defenses THEN Foreman should rank lower than Holmes...dumbass. IF you like resume THEN Foreman should rank higher than Holmes...dumbass

--
Q:

Holmes didn’t fight anyone up until 1978 . It’s a golden era based on 2 guys , Frazier and Ali who didnt rematch until years apart and one was past his best more then the other .

Frazier himself did not defend the title but a handful of times and everyone lost to each other but when it happens in this era they are bums .

--
A:

Well, you're just wrong. Joe's defenses:

def. Manuel Ramos on Jun 24, 1968
def. Oscar Bonavena on Dec 10, 1968
def. Dave Zyglewicz on Apr 22, 1969
def. Jerry Quarry on Jun 23, 1969
def. Jimmy Ellis on Feb 16, 1970
Undisputed
def. Bob Foster on Nov 18, 1970
def. Muhammad Ali on Mar 8, 1971
def. Terry Daniels on Jan 15, 1972
def. Ron Stander on May 25, 1972

Outside of being wrong about Joe, Holmes doesn't have a great resume you say? Well, no ****, I did caveat Holmes didn't I? Dumbass

--

Klitschko has no resume wins what ? And your here talking about hate ,one of the more pointless posters on here again.

--

You always respond to my pointlessness....for some reason. You even throw fits over pointlessness.

What are Wlad's ATG level wins? Peter? quit bull****ting. If Mike ****ing Tyson has no resume and falls under a defense numbers category than Wlad damn sure does. Fun fact, every single one of Mike's defenses was against a man who either is a champion, was a champion, or had beaten a champion. Inversely only a few of Wlad's defenses were against a champion, a former, or a man who beat a champion, leaving him with more time in office while having less names and accolades attached to those names than Mike and his foe's careers.

Go on with your raving loony tune ass and tell how Sam Peter was worth a **** or that Chris Byrd isn't Wlad's best win ever and isn't Tyson's era's ****ing b-side.