Comments Thread For: Joshua Would Sign For Fury Fight Right Now, Says Hearn

[NachoMan]

Looking forward to watching Joshua land that big juicy uppercut on fury’s shiny bald head....timber

On his chin specifically?

[_Rexy_]

Obviously, you are ahead of your own conspiracy theory. Hearn had already said and explained why the purse AJ - Fury fight will be 50/50.

That shows how ****** your comment sounds.

Yeah, and Hearn has never lied to the public before...

[Inspired]

"would sign" ??? - So sign. What are you waiting for?

Sign a contract unconditional on the outcomes of your fight with Pulev and Fury's fight with Wilder.

Hearn, AJ and his team have done this many times.
Publicly stating they would make a fight when it is least sensible to discuss the next fight.

Politics.

why don't you just become a promoter if it's so simple?
there are all manner of conditions they need to agree on first.
the stadium/arena, rematch clauses, the ring, gloves, the date etc.
you can't just sign a magical contract.

idiot.

[Jkp]

Joshua probably would but Hearn would come in with some low ball offer and the AJ ballgaggers would start making threads about how legit the offer was.

Eddie couldn't even make a fight between AJ and one of his own fighters(Dillian Whyte) last year.

[Jkp]

Looking forward to watching Joshua land that big juicy uppercut on fury’s shiny bald head....timber

He couldnt even land a decent punch on a stationary obese 6 foot mexican, who trained at taco bell for the fight.

[Jkp]

UK heavy weights love to talk big when they have fights booked, or when theres a pandemic preventing any boxing from happening.

[Jkp]

Notice how Eddie throws out "Roadblock" Dillian Whyte line, at the end of his sentence. Going to be just like Wilder.... where they use ***** whyte as an excuse to prevent Fury fighting AJ. pathetic...

[just the facts]

Looking forward to watching Joshua land that big juicy uppercut on fury’s shiny bald head....timber

Savvy boxers like Fury don't get hit with slow, telegraphed uppercuts.

[Ant1979]

What's to argue about? They both accept its a 50/50 fight with regard to the revenue split. They are both English, so they would presumably both demand an English venue. What else is there that really matters? Ring size, gloves, who gets announced first? I don't see any real problems.

Not sure if AJ is as accepting that it's a 50/50 purse split and no way does Fury accept less than 50%. Afterall he could also argue his case for more than 50%, especially after a trilogy win.

May come down to splitting the PPV audiences. AJ will want a larger cut of the UK one due to his popularity and numbers generated and the fact that Fury hasn't fought in the UK for years. While Fury will obviously want a much bigger chunk of the US revenue where he's established himself more with the WWE jaunt and trilogy against Wilder. Again he'll also point toward AJ's one appearance in the US as being a flop.

Then there's the venue. Without question AJ would consider Wembley Stadium as home advantage while Fury and Arum etc feel AJ's a lot more vulnerable in the likes of Vegas where Fury is more than comfortable being the home fighter.

They also may have reason to believe such a massive fight in Vegas may bring on a certain degree of anxiety for AJ as was suggested in the first Ruiz fight. There was definitely something wrong with AJ, his demeanor, body language were completely different that night. I'm fairly sure the US is the last place he wants to have the fight for all the marbles.

Then there's Saudi Arabia with all in the money? Who knows? As for the petty stuff like who comes out first, who's on what side of the poster etc I get the impression that will fall into place once the splits and venue are agreed. Lot of egos and justifiable points on both sides.

[Ray*]

There is nothing wrong in having a plan in place, this happens all the time with big fights, people sit down and work out scenarios and a deal would be put in place if everything goes to plan, then things would have already be in place.