One Proposed Rule Change in Boxing..

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • QueensburyRules
    Undisputed Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • May 2018
    • 22565
    • 2,474
    • 18
    • 187,708

    #31
    Originally posted by strykr619
    Same day hydration with hydration requirement to be able to fight.... Will keep fighters in their lane and not weight hop.
    - -Mo' dimwittery solves all, eh?

    U hopped up too?

    Comment

    • BobLoblaw
      Interim Champion
      Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
      • Jun 2017
      • 727
      • 40
      • 33
      • 15,921

      #32
      Originally posted by UNBANNED
      1 Champion per weight class

      11 or 13 rounds

      Problem solved
      I like the sound of 13 rounds for title Fights.

      Comment

      • BobLoblaw
        Interim Champion
        Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
        • Jun 2017
        • 727
        • 40
        • 33
        • 15,921

        #33
        Some interesting suggestions on the thread. I think we all want 1 belt and 1 champion but won't happen before a single governing body is formed. Instant replay is a must and should be enforced by all bodies and commissioners.

        Comment

        • The D3vil
          WBA/WBC/WBO/IBF/Lineal
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Mar 2016
          • 6354
          • 1,625
          • 1,430
          • 56,286

          #34
          Originally posted by ShoulderRoll
          Only one world champion in each weight class.
          This I like & you should have to defend your belt against the top rated contender at least once a year or you get stripped

          Comment

          • MulaKO
            Zero F@cks Given
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Oct 2007
            • 26896
            • 6,762
            • 6,070
            • 221,421

            #35
            Originally posted by ELPacman
            Interviews with the judges post fight, to explain wtf they just scored. If what they say sounds like nonsense, whoever is interviewing them, calls them out for it on live tv to embarrass the f*k out of them.

            I think that’s a great idea
            Get some insight on close fights and like you said , when it’s quite clear they fughed up , call them out on it
            I bet there would be a lot less screwed up cards


            Originally posted by The D3vil
            I would have judging done by a board of judges. Maybe like 10 people.

            It'd be like voting for the Hall of Fame or P4P rankings.

            It'd be made up of journalists, ex-fighters, and highly esteemed boxing people.

            That way Oscar couldn't just wine & dine Adelaide Byrd and get a favorable card.

            I get what your saying but then we’d only get the results 3 days later lol
            There’d be some heavy debates let me tell you

            Comment

            Working...
            TOP