Can anyone deny these double standards against Joshua?

[OnlytheTruth]

1. Tyson Fury defeats Klitschko by nullifying his most dangerous weapon; its a masterclass. Joshua beats Ruiz by nullifying his most dangerous weapon; he ran?

The only counter argument is that Klitschko is/was a higher level fighter than Ruiz is now or likely ever will be. However, nullifying your opponents main offensive skills in order to win by a WIDE margin can only be a masterclass or running away. It cannot be both.

2. All boxing fans will say that Wilder needed to change his style (if thats possible) to beat Fury - but say that Joshua ran from Ruiz when he changed his style to win. Fury changed his approach in order to beat Wilder too.

3. Deontay Wilder knocks out Luis Ortiz, twice. Luis Ortiz was 40 at the time of the rematch - why do Wilder fans say that Joshua's KO of Klitschko was because he was too old!? There is no comparison between Ortiz and Klitschko. Then...why do Fury fans say that Fury will wipe Joshua out when Fury didn't come close to knocking Klit out?

All undeniable double standards.

[Earl-Hickey]

On point one, Steve Bunce said, If Joshua hasn't fought the Ruiz rematch and instead Fury had showed up and did exactly what AJ did everyone would have called it a masterclass and that is the **** on truth.

[KillaMane26]

Why are certain opinions guys said and generalizing entire fanbases?

1. People (not me) gave Joshua shyt cuz he lost to a late replacement, got destroyed. Then came into the rematch and seemed to be scared to engage. If Wilder somehow refused to engage vs Fury in the rematch ge would get called a pssy.

2. I don't get why this wasn't apart of your first point.
Floyd fans had to deal with his performances being labeled as running. And Joshua aint half the fighter Floyd is!

Im 100% alot of Joshua fans were apart if the fans critiquing Floyd for running. I guess Joshua became above the running stigma once he did it. Which is a double standard.

3. Wlad was old and Joshua benefited from it. And Wilder to this day can't escape the criticism of fighting a guy "with high blood pressure" The difference is... Ortiz wasn't once the caliber of fighter Wlad was. If he was Wilder would have got the same criticism

Quit whining......

[Lonelystoner]

You're right. Fury has the complexion for the protection

[Thunderstruck]

On #2 Fury changed his style and got aggressive and took the fight to Wilder.AJ changed his style by running away and refusing to engage a blubbering sweaty snicker bar eating fat guy.

[Lonelystoner]

On #2 Fury changed his style and got aggressive and took the fight to Wilder.AJ changed his style by running away and refusing to engage a blubbering sweaty snicker bar eating fat guy.

Why would Joshua choose to walk Ruiz down in the rematch when that's the main reason he got knocked out in the first fight?

[removed]

Look at how Fury and Wilder handle rematches. They dominate and destroy, they don't run. Wilder lost his last rematch admittedly, but that was against the best boxer of the era.

[Earl-Hickey]

Why are certain opinions guys said and generalizing entire fanbases?

1. People (not me) gave Joshua shyt cuz he lost to a late replacement, got destroyed. Then came into the rematch and seemed to be scared to engage. If Wilder somehow refused to engage vs Fury in the rematch ge would get called a pssy.

2. I don't get why this wasn't apart of your first point.
Floyd fans had to deal with his performances being labeled as running. And Joshua aint half the fighter Floyd is!

Im 100% alot of Joshua fans were apart if the fans critiquing Floyd for running. I guess Joshua became above the running stigma once he did it. Which is a double standard.

3. Wlad was old and Joshua benefited from it. And Wilder to this day can't escape the criticism of fighting a guy "with high blood pressure" The difference is... Ortiz wasn't once the caliber of fighter Wlad was. If he was Wilder would have got the same criticism

Quit whining......

Only going to address point one because after reading it going any further would be a waste of time

Ruiz did destroy Joshua the first time, the second time Joshua learned that Ruiz can only beat him if he stands in front of him so he didn't stand in front of him and won 12-0

Why would he do literally the exact same thing that lost him the first fight and give Ruiz his only possible method of victory

You then **** on AJ for it because you hate him and wanted him to lose again

ALSO

AJ haters said AJ COULDNT outbox Ruiz on the back foot for 12 rounds as he didn't have the stamina, and their lack of boxing knowledge and bias was AGAIN exposed

Period

[RJJ-94-02=GOAT]

Point 1 he compares Wladimir Klitschko to Andy Ruiz Jr.

Hahahahaha what’s the point?

[KillaMane26]

Only going to address point one because after reading it going any further would be a waste of time

Ruiz did destroy Joshua the first time, the second time Joshua learned that Ruiz can only beat him if he stands in front of him so he didn't stand in front of him and won 12-0

Why would he do literally the exact same thing that lost him the first fight and give Ruiz his only possible method of victory

You then **** on AJ for it because you hate him and wanted him to lose again

Period

Dumbass.... Anybody who checks my post history can tell you... I never had no problem with what Joshua did.

He did what he had to do... Why risk it?

Thats yall problem yall assume everybody thinks the same.... I can't even have my own opinion about things without being generalized.

Everyone knows ima Wilder fan but i awlways defended Joshua in tbe rematch! But yall dudes never around when i give unbiased opinions! Or give props to the opposing side!

Yall are annoying asf

This first sentence i said ( not me) as in thats not my personal opinion.