Would Crawford be called the biggest ducker and cherrypicker if he was with PBC....

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • SplitSecond
    Undisputed Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Nov 2009
    • 23151
    • 1,715
    • 1,187
    • 85,044

    #31
    Originally posted by just the facts
    There might only be 1 PBC fighter on the p4p list but how many top 10 welterweights (the division Crawford fights in)are with PBC? At least 6 out of the top 7 and wouldn't Ugas and especially Porter be a helluva step up from Crawford's welter resume?
    Sure, not like I don’t want those fights to happen.

    But this is what you should take into consideration. PBC has a stacked division in welterweight where it should be difficult to cherrypick like they do in their other weightclasses and yet have not managed to create a legit P4P beast. That’s all you really need to realise.

    If Taylor beats Ramirez they should just replace Spence with him in every P4P list.

    Comment

    • mcdonalds
      Undisputed Champion
      • Oct 2017
      • 3700
      • 298
      • 11
      • 106,172

      #32
      Originally posted by SplitSecond
      Sure, not like I don’t want those fights to happen.

      But this is what you should take into consideration. PBC has a stacked division in welterweight where it should be difficult to cherrypick like they do in their other weightclasses and yet have not managed to create a legit P4P beast. That’s all you really need to realise.

      If Taylor beats Ramirez they should just replace Spence with him in every P4P list.
      How are you in the place to even criticize their resumes when they have all fought better opponents in comparison to who Crawford has fought?

      "P4P doe" who cares, look at Crawford's resume. He's supposedly the "P4P" king but his best win is Postol. It's a joke

      Comment

      Working...
      TOP