Was the term ATG made up to trash HOF boxers?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ShaneMosleySr
    Banned
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Mar 2019
    • 10325
    • 1,049
    • 903
    • 276,311

    #1

    Was the term ATG made up to trash HOF boxers?

    I see people throw around the term “all-time great” a lot on this site.

    I thought I knew what “all-time great” meant. I thought it was a synonym for a hall of famer. If someone was in the hall of fame, they’re an all-time great. I thought the hall of fame was created to help people keep track of the greatest boxers throughout history.

    But it seems like when people throw around “all-time great” on this forum, it’s usually done to create a separate class of fighters in the hall of fame. I don’t know what the criteria is, but it seems some in the hall of fame are “all-time greats” and others aren’t.

    I personally think the term is used so people can attack accomplished boxers they don’t like.

    So I would like to know the criteria for being an all-time great. If you think the term is mostly used to say something negative about a hall of fame boxer, then speak up too please.
  • KillaMane26
    Big Boi Beezy
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Apr 2014
    • 16298
    • 2,565
    • 533
    • 174,475

    #2
    Huhhhh. Idk but ATG should be in a separate class than HOF. Can't help fans motives behind using it

    Comment

    • Boxing_1013
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Feb 2019
      • 6845
      • 184
      • 256
      • 157,917

      #3
      I think ATG has always meant the creme de la creme...Jordan is an ATG, Bird is, Magic is. Tracy McGrady is a HOFer...I don't know of anyone who says he is an ATG.

      Comment

      • asero_831
        Amateur
        Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
        • Apr 2020
        • 29
        • 4
        • 0
        • 3,219

        #4
        ATG are mostly first ballot HOF-erms

        Comment

        • just the facts
          Undisputed Champion
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Jan 2014
          • 13791
          • 2,437
          • 1,021
          • 88,113

          #5
          I don't know but with all of the undeserving fighter in the hof , makes sense.

          Comment

          • The D3vil
            WBA/WBC/WBO/IBF/Lineal
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Mar 2016
            • 6369
            • 1,633
            • 1,439
            • 56,286

            #6
            Originally posted by ShaneMosleySr
            I see people throw around the term “all-time great” a lot on this site.

            I thought I knew what “all-time great” meant. I thought it was a synonym for a hall of famer. If someone was in the hall of fame, they’re an all-time great. I thought the hall of fame was created to help people keep track of the greatest boxers throughout history.

            But it seems like when people throw around “all-time great” on this forum, it’s usually done to create a separate class of fighters in the hall of fame. I don’t know what the criteria is, but it seems some in the hall of fame are “all-time greats” and others aren’t.

            I personally think the term is used so people can attack accomplished boxers they don’t like.

            So I would like to know the criteria for being an all-time great. If you think the term is mostly used to say something negative about a hall of fame boxer, then speak up too please.
            Originally posted by Boxing_1013
            I think ATG has always meant the creme de la creme...Jordan is an ATG, Bird is, Magic is. Tracy McGrady is a HOFer...I don't know of anyone who says he is an ATG.
            This right here.

            Arturo Gatti's a Hall of Famer, but nobody would say he's an all-time great like say. . . Alexis Arguello

            Comment

            Working...
            TOP