Why is JMMarquez one Canelos biggest detractors?

[Shadoww702]

Which part of what Marquez said is wrong?

When he said Jacobs beat Canelo. That’s when I knew it was all personal and JMM was super salty...

[Shadoww702]

never claimed they were dog ****, eyeShadow. But they were NOT the best in their division like the cinnamon loving ts stated. But thanks for backing up to the ts, like you Saul lovers do

Nahhh I just like fkn with the Haters...Especially when I collect my $$$. You dumb dumbs thought ggg was gonna stomp him before they fought.

[JohnCastellanos]

I'm no particular fan of JMM but I'm with him if as you suspect he's sick of a-side privilege.

No way he goes undefeated though, unless he never fights above LW, then maybe.

Marquez was truly a badass and I get the feeling that he feels like he did all the heavy lifting and someone else is getting the benefit of his back breaking work

[meat_abstract]

There is also a rich tradition of Mexican fighters resenting each other over who's a "real" Mexican fighter. See Chavez vs. De La Hoya. I'm not saying he is, but it's certainly possible to see Canelo as a "sell-out", not least because of his association with De La Hoya.

[ramses07]

I personally don’t think it’s as simple as him hating on Canelo for TF of it. My su****ion is Marquez was a guy that always had to concede everything to the Aside fighters and his greatest accomplishments he achieved them under some Fkup circumstances, and he also was a victim of bad decisions that he was forced to accept because he was the Bside. It must be tough for him to see a fighter like Canelo, he must think to him self “if I had all that juice I woulda been undefeated and the GOAT!” My opinion! What do you guys think?

kinda agree with this

Marquez was more talented than Canelo (hes no slouch either)

but talent doesnt usually mean A side or higher purses

[SUBZER0ED]

Marquez was a workhorse and a warrior. Alvarez... not so much.

[BoloShot]

It's because Canelo has fixed fights, drug cheating, cherry picking, rehydration clauses, etc. He also is severely overrated. He has terrible output that often does little to convince me, yeah he does it in flashy style but he also gets beaten for most of his fights a lot of the time. The only time he succeeds is if he steps up the pace but he always gasses out quickly. For someone who trains so much he has terrible aerobic fitness.

[EL GANCHO]

never claimed they were dog ****, eyeShadow. But they were NOT the best in their division like the cinnamon loving ts stated. But thanks for backing up to the ts, like you Saul lovers do

Hahaha EYEshadow 😂😂😂😂

[FRANKIE420247]

Canelo is a protected fighter, that lost the first fight to GGG. he beat good names that were either small or faded or both. I hope he fights billy joe soon as it's a fight that I hope anybody wins as both guys are pricks. See ya

[Thuglife Nelo]

There is also a rich tradition of Mexican fighters resenting each other over who's a "real" Mexican fighter. See Chavez vs. De La Hoya. I'm not saying he is, but it's certainly possible to see Canelo as a "sell-out", not least because of his association with De La Hoya.

Good stuff. But to Marquez’s frame of mind he comes from the legend’s gym, Beristain. Nacho is a bonafide G. Got medals for Mexico. It’s also ego, the guys from Mexico City (capital) think they’re above all other states. Reynoso’s aren’t deep in pedigree like Nacho, no way! It’s just sad that Nacho don’t like Canelo.

I think Nacho ain’t into the commercial side of USA’s boxing industry, and like you said, under the umbrella of Mexican American branding; GBP.

Nacho’s a big gambler too. Probably put money on Canelo on the downlow thinking Canelo was going to avenge Marquez’s loss to Floyd considering Nelo is the harder puncher and bigger guy. It is what it is. The Angulo fight didn’t help either. Keep in mind Nelo KO’d Kirkland in which Angulo couldn’t.

But Marquez a hoe. In fact Marquez is the Carl Froch of Mexico.

Marquez do got one of the baddest KO’s in Mexican history doe.