And discuss !!
Whose WBA Regular win is better, Canelo’s Fielding or GGG’s Tapia?
Collapse
-
Whose WBA Regular win is better, Canelo’s Fielding or GGG’s Tapia?
14Canelo vs Fielding71.43%10GGG vs Tapia28.57%4Tags: None -
-
-
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
In the eyes of pretty much everyone who watched Ryder beat Fielding, but of course Fielding is better than Tapia.
Course the circumstances of the two fights are worlds apart though, I ain't faulting Canelo for picking Rocky cos he was a top 10ish guy - officially - in a higher division. As filler fights go he's better than the vast majority, but the fact is Canelo can choose exactly who he wants to fight every time out. Very few fighters have that luxury.
Golovkin OTOH only fought Tapia because the WBA invented their new 'Sturm doesn't have to fight Golovkin ' rule back in early 2010. He should have been fighting Sturm, and Tapia was the rancid bone the WBA tossed him instead. Given that at the time he had no promoter and was in legal limbo unable to fight in either his adoptive Germany or the US he's probably lucky he got that.
A few weeks ago, an interesting story was making the rounds Germany. Promoter Ahmet Oner of Arena Box, who briefly worked with former middleweight champion Felix Sturm, explained how Sturm used money and politics to avoid a mandatory defense against Gennady Golovkin. Golovkin had been Sturm's mandatory challenger for years, but he was unable to secure his shot. When Golovkin was finally on the verge of landing that shot, Sturm was mysteriously elevated to the status of "super champion" by the WBA. Golovkin was eventually made the "regular" champion by the sanctioning body.
Like I say, the context makes the situations very different, although quite clearly Fielding is a far better win.Comment
-
if you want real context as to why Fielding and Tapia are good wins is because ''filler'' is actually Plant vs Mike Lee. Unifications trump nonsensical mandos. and Mike Lee was aided to get to that position. Point is Plant still took that fight. You got GGG fighting Rolls or Charlo fighting Adams... I don't see how Fielding was a bad fight when boxing has real ''FILLERS.''In the eyes of pretty much everyone who watched Ryder beat Fielding, but of course Fielding is better than Tapia.
Course the circumstances of the two fights are worlds apart though, I ain't faulting Canelo for picking Rocky cos he was a top 10ish guy - officially - in a higher division. As filler fights go he's better than the vast majority, but the fact is Canelo can choose exactly who he wants to fight every time out. Very few fighters have that luxury.
Golovkin OTOH only fought Tapia because the WBA invented their new 'Sturm doesn't have to fight Golovkin ' rule back in early 2010. He should have been fighting Sturm, and Tapia was the rancid bone the WBA tossed him instead. Given that at the time he had no promoter and was in legal limbo unable to fight in either his adoptive Germany or the US he's probably lucky he got that.
A few weeks ago, an interesting story was making the rounds Germany. Promoter Ahmet Oner of Arena Box, who briefly worked with former middleweight champion Felix Sturm, explained how Sturm used money and politics to avoid a mandatory defense against Gennady Golovkin. Golovkin had been Sturm's mandatory challenger for years, but he was unable to secure his shot. When Golovkin was finally on the verge of landing that shot, Sturm was mysteriously elevated to the status of "super champion" by the WBA. Golovkin was eventually made the "regular" champion by the sanctioning body.
Like I say, the context makes the situations very different, although quite clearly Fielding is a far better win.Comment
-
Comment