ken Norton is bigger name than all todays heavyweights
Collapse
-
I've never gotten whole idea that Norton had "nerves" against big punchers. He just didn't have a good chin, and IMO his whole style was built around that fact. He had great defense and countered before the other guy could get a combination off. But against huge punchers (Foreman, Shavers, Cooney) it only took one punch to stagger him, and his defense collapsed. But against guys like Ali, who couldn't hurt him too bad with one punch, his style was very effective. His only other weakness was that, being a counter-puncher, he could get outworked or at least give the appearance of getting outworked since he was always waiting for the other guy to go first.
Against today's heavies: Wilder would probably KO him, just like Shavers did. Joshua would have a harder time, and would have to hope he caught him clean with something big before eating too many counters - pretty even fight. Fury would really struggle - it's a style nightmare for him, just like it was for Ali. Can't KO him, can't get him off you, blocks & counters everything... he's have to try to stay outside and jab his way to victory like Holmes did. Holmes said Norton was the hardest fight of his career.Comment
-
Had Wilder not ducked AJ I'm fairly convinced AJ would have slept him early.
Not saying AJ can beat Fury necessary but I don't rate the wilder win that high for Fury, Wilder was an accident waiting to happen and 50 year old Ortiz was a clean punch from causing itComment
-
Comment
-
For the simple fact that Ken Norton was a top heavyweight, during a time in history when? Boxing was probably still the worlds most popular sport 'When Giants walked the face of the earth' Historically in 100's of years time 'Due to the legend of that era, Ken Norton's legacy will most likely carry more weight than most of the heavyweights active today 'Whether they can beat him or not etc'Comment
-
Lol 215 lbs 6ft3. He would get manhandled by Fury, Joshua and even Wilder would ko him. Sports evolve and even tho their boxing looked sharper and more esthetic back in the day, modern day boxers would dominate most of the time H2H.Comment
-
This is exactly how I view Norton and how I figure he’d fair against today’s crop. Impressive. If you are capable of providing the same sort of in-depth analysis for every single active fighter then you’re approaching my level.I've never gotten whole idea that Norton had "nerves" against big punchers. He just didn't have a good chin, and IMO his whole style was built around that fact. He had great defense and countered before the other guy could get a combination off. But against huge punchers (Foreman, Shavers, Cooney) it only took one punch to stagger him, and his defense collapsed. But against guys like Ali, who couldn't hurt him too bad with one punch, his style was very effective. His only other weakness was that, being a counter-puncher, he could get outworked or at least give the appearance of getting outworked since he was always waiting for the other guy to go first.
Against today's heavies: Wilder would probably KO him, just like Shavers did. Joshua would have a harder time, and would have to hope he caught him clean with something big before eating too many counters - pretty even fight. Fury would really struggle - it's a style nightmare for him, just like it was for Ali. Can't KO him, can't get him off you, blocks & counters everything... he's have to try to stay outside and jab his way to victory like Holmes did. Holmes said Norton was the hardest fight of his career.Last edited by TheMyspaceDayz; 04-11-2020, 06:42 AM.Comment
-
My point was that that poster (Madison Boxing) likes to come across like some boxing expert. He gave a totally ignorant post about Ken Norton. My point is that if you don't even know who Cervantes was, you can't really know anything about Norton. Both of them fought at relatively the same time. That poster (Madison Boxing) is a racist scum bag with an Anti American agenda.Comment
Comment