Just wondering? Both have zero titles, both have very little in way of wins over top 10 opposition and they have both only faced 1 real top fighter.
Both have lost to Tyson Fury but there is some strong arguments that Fury should of lost to Wallin considering the state of that cut, Wallin clearly took a couple of rounds off Fury too. On the other hand Wilder got completely dominated, couldn't win a round, wasn't the least bit competitive and got stopped by a so called feather fist.
Now if we want to detract from Anthony Joshua after his loss to Ruiz, even though nobody else has beaten Ruiz, nobody else has floored Ruiz and even though Joshua cruised to victory in a rematch it doesn't seem to be taken in to account then why do we pretend that Wilder only lost cuz he's fighting the divisions number 1 and ignore the fact he looked like a useless club fighter and fighters deemed lower ranked managed to put up a better fight than he did.
So maybe Wallin needs to be raised up in the rankings, nobody else has ever beaten him, or Wilder needs to be dropped below where Wallin is.
Both have lost to Tyson Fury but there is some strong arguments that Fury should of lost to Wallin considering the state of that cut, Wallin clearly took a couple of rounds off Fury too. On the other hand Wilder got completely dominated, couldn't win a round, wasn't the least bit competitive and got stopped by a so called feather fist.
Now if we want to detract from Anthony Joshua after his loss to Ruiz, even though nobody else has beaten Ruiz, nobody else has floored Ruiz and even though Joshua cruised to victory in a rematch it doesn't seem to be taken in to account then why do we pretend that Wilder only lost cuz he's fighting the divisions number 1 and ignore the fact he looked like a useless club fighter and fighters deemed lower ranked managed to put up a better fight than he did.
So maybe Wallin needs to be raised up in the rankings, nobody else has ever beaten him, or Wilder needs to be dropped below where Wallin is.
Comment