Is Carl Froch a HOF'er?
Collapse
-
-
1. The MAJORITY of boxing fans feel Froch was greater. Do you want to take all the polls conducted on the subject and find out?
2. Why are you refusing to answer a simple question. Explain what made Kessler so elite?
You run from my lengthy post that I've been asking you to answer like the plague lol
The fact you had to get your computer out just to respond says it all...😂
Kessler beat a prime Froch, if Kessler wasn’t elite what does that make Froch?Comment
-
Run alongComment
-
Comment
-
I just answered why Kessler was elite. So if you don’t think he was what does that make Froch considering Kessler beat him clearly Prime vs Prime?Comment
-
Comment
-
Serious question. You saying "he beat him", doesn't speak to greater, you fool.
Buster Douglass beat Tyson and Spinks beat Ali. Does that mean they're greater?
Again, you continue with this silly low level conversation when you could've responded to my post yesterday. You refuse because you know you won't win this debate.Comment
-
Comment
-
I completely disagree bro.
Calzaghe has better accomplishments, longevity and wins.
Calzaghe also won lineal titles at 168 and 175 and was also the undisputed #1 at 168, something Froch never was largely due to Ward.
Calzaghe beat a prime Kessler and a very good version of B-Hop who despite being past his peak was unquestionably still an elite fighter. Froch never beat an elite fighter. Add that to Eubank, Reid, Woodhall, Brewer, Mitchell, Lacy, Bika and the resumes are very close. Joe beat all those guys clearly as well except for B-Hop.
You’re entitled to your opinion though man so agree to disagree.
“You’re entitled to your opinion so agree to disagree”... I’m cool if you think Froch was greater than Calzaghe but I disagree with it. Discussion over.
Obviously this guy is some weirdo fanboy who can’t accept the fact that some people consider Calzaghe a greater fighter than Froch.
So this sad f***er had to go and get his computer out so he could drag this discussion out despite it being completely pointless as neither of us were going to change our OPINION.
This is firmly my last response as I’m just gonna put this clown on ignore.
Seriously man I wouldn’t bother quoting this as you won’t get a response and I’m not going to read anymore of your bias nonsense.
Calzaghe>Kessler>Froch the results PROVE that...Comment
-
I’ll refer to my second post.
“You’re entitled to your opinion so agree to disagree”... I’m cool if you think Froch was greater than Calzaghe but I disagree with it. Discussion over.
Obviously this guy is some weirdo fanboy who can’t accept the fact that some people consider Calzaghe a greater fighter than Froch.
So this sad f***er had to go and get his computer out so he could drag this discussion out despite it being completely pointless as neither of us were going to change our OPINION.
This is firmly my last response as I’m just gonna put this clown on ignore.
Seriously man I wouldn’t bother quoting this as you won’t get a response and I’m not going to read anymore of your bias nonsense.
Calzaghe>Kessler>Froch the results PROVE that...
Would've been much easier to just admit you couldn't answer the post and admit your logic was skewed. Too much pride on boxingscene. You want to get sensitive and put me on ignore cool. But I never trolled you and took time out to thoroughly answer your post while using your own logic, requirements and standards. You clearly couldn't handle it and broke down.
And lol calling me a Froch fan boy. Don't think I've heard that one before.
Oh well, hopefully we can still be cool on other threads. Take care combating the CoronavirusLast edited by Chollo Vista; 04-01-2020, 09:20 AM.Comment
Comment