Comments Thread For: Malignaggi Strongly Backs Fury To Defeat Joshua, Explains Why
Collapse
-
Firstly, Fury's slaps can't concuss AJ and secondly, AJ is a powerful combination boxer with stiff jabs. I could see AJ spark Fury.Comment
-
Let's act like fat pub fighter McDermott didn't pulverise Fury into submission. McDermott is a bum and he works at McDs now.
Let's act like Swedish plate Wallin did pulverise Fury's eye a few months ago and the fight wouldn't have been stopped if it were in the UK.
Ever seen Josh struggle against bums like McDermott and Wallin or knocked down by a cruiserweight like Cunningham?
If Fury had fought the version of Wlad that Josh fought - he would've been sparked clean.Comment
-
Joshua fought the older version of Wlad..... And almost knocked tf out.Let's act like fat pub fighter McDermott didn't pulverise Fury into submission. McDermott is a bum and he works at McDs now.
Let's act like Swedish plate Wallin did pulverise Fury's eye a few months ago and the fight wouldn't have been stopped if it were in the UK.
Ever seen Josh struggle against bums like McDermott and Wallin or knocked down by a cruiserweight like Cunningham?
If Fury had fought the version of Wlad that Josh fought - he would've been sparked clean.
Where is the lie.... U kill all the good points you make when you go and use that as your closing statementComment
-
I guess you didn't watch the Wlad that fought Fury vs the Wlad that fought Josh then.
When Josh sparks out Fury, I'm sure you clowns will find another excuse.Comment
-
This third fight is going to be interesting for the time factor between fights.
Fury is better compared to Joshua, sorry but Joshua have a puncher chance and is going to go down as the fight go deep and trying boxing Fury, I see Joshua losing.
Comment
-
Fury and Joshua fought him totally different and brought two different skillsets to the table.
So please explain besides you riding dude nuts of why The older version was better?
GTFOH..... Blow****Comment
-
The same way you rode the nuts of the loud Alabama bum with bird legs until he got pulverised into submission and throwing in the white towel by a tall, fat and clumsy gypo. Now you’re riding the nuts of the tall, fat and clumsy gypo. I guess you must have a thing for clumsy speaker mouth fcckers, you plastic schmuck. LMAO.
I know you yanks aren’t the sharpest tool in the shed. But I’ll give yer dumb arse the benefit of the doubt. Boxing isn’t fought based on speaker mouth with the loudest and who has the biggest wave atm. It’s fought in the ring. I already highlighted how Josh beats Fury. I don’t care about bandwagon crap. The onus is on you to highlight how Fury beats Josh.
Josh is faster and stronger. Punches harder with both hands. Has better balance and is more fluid in throwing combinations. He’s better on the inside and midrange and has shown he can fight on the backfoot and be disciplined when he needs to.Comment
-
KillaMane26
Still bleating around like a goat and can't find answers?
- I told you numbnuts that Ruiz has slow feet and Josh would outclass him in the rematch and stop him late. Got that right apart from the stoppage because Ruiz didn't gas from the mid rounds like he has done throughout his career.
- I told you idiots that Fury isn't as skilled as advertised and the defensive juggernaut attached to his name is crap and he'll struggle against Wallin. And I was proven right.
- I told you schmucks that Fury will stop Wilder and Wilder is an overrated bum with exaggerated right hand. And I got it right.
I don't watch boxing and listen to idiots like you clowns do. I watch boxing and note the strengths of fighters, hence I'm right most of the time. Josh beats Fury convincingly. I'd even pick Dillian Whyte to give Fury a lot of problems and show how ordinary Fury is.Comment
Comment