Youngest Flyweight champion and the oldest welterweight champion.

[KillaMane26]

I agree with you but what does 20 losses have to do with anything ?? Those guys fought 10 times as much and constantly against the best , fighters of today would have many more loses to . I just dont see how many loses a fighter has effects their all time status. Never have . Alot of those loses old.timers fought said guy 8 times and won most of them. It was a differnt game back then , so Imo not fair to judge any fighters all time status off their loses it's about the content of their wins and loses etc . Avenged loses . Etc dont u think ??

Yeah you have to take into account the landscape of boxing at the time when judging these old fighters!

Its like Ray Robinson's record you have take into account how often he fought, how long he went undefeated b4 losing, who he lost to, how many times they fought, how many losses he avenged, the weightclass he jumped when he lost, and the his age when he started to lose.

If you a study the game nobody should have to explain these things.

When i first got into boxing the second thing i did was research the history of the sport and the respected fighters from back in the day to gain perspective.

[Thraxox]

I dont take muc account on 70s below fighters. Many fighters above the 70s were greater. Mannys the best fighter of his era where he broke multiple records that boxers only could have dreamed of but until Pacquiao did it.