There isn't a case. The main witness lied in the first place, now he's admitted that all further evidence from him is dismissible in court. Non-story.
If the witness lied and that's a fact, then so did Fury. If the witness told the truth, then Fury didn't lie and is in the clear. Enjoying shooting yourself in the foot?
If the witness lied and that's a fact, then so did Fury. If the witness told the truth, then Fury didn't lie and is in the clear. Enjoying shooting yourself in the foot?
Fury will deny all knowledge and Frank has already said that Fury has never met the man.
Still seems kinda fishy. I mean, why would the farmer just come out and say this for the hell of it? I mean what does he really stand to gain from this?
Still seems kinda fishy. I mean, why would the farmer just come out and say this for the hell of it? I mean what does he really stand to gain from this?
The story could be true, or not, but Fury already got a 2 years suspension for this. It's over.
Still seems kinda fishy. I mean, why would the farmer just come out and say this for the hell of it? I mean what does he really stand to gain from this?
Money duhhh. Do you think the DM hasn't paid him for this story?
The story could be true, or not, but Fury already got a 2 years suspension for this. It's over.
Once a cheat, always a cheat.
This means that he most likely beat Wlad while cheating.
That's a big deal whether it's 5 years ago or 5 days ago because he's been living off of that reputation ever since. Is there any doubt as to why he wouldn't rematch Wladimir? I don't think so.
Comment