Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Frank Warren Disputes Claim of Payoff in Tyson Fury UKAD Case

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #91
    Any man willing to kill someone by hitting them with their bare fist would surely bribe someone to lie. Tyson Fury is a drug cheat and a full blown cheater. How many things and how much evidence has to come out about the guy before his blind followers and fans get it. He IS still a very good boxer but he is a known and documented cheater.

    Comment


    • #92
      He still a great champ

      Comment


      • #93
        Originally posted by MDPopescu View Post
        ... as long you still hold property "back home", you don't lose your roots...
        That rings true

        Comment


        • #94
          Originally posted by Ray* View Post
          Fury case didn’t take 18 months to resolve, so not why you are looking for examples. Fact is Fury failed a test for the hammer fight for nandrolone, something that can be produced naturally. But he and Hughie level were severely high. And their explanation was “They ate Wild boar” every two weeks.

          At the time (2016), I posted on here that I don’t believe that defence. And I made it clear then!!! That isn’t hating or anything. It’s just boxing talk and discussion.

          Now you got this man coming out and saying he signed TWO witness statements claiming he supplied it, when he never did.
          The Hammer fight was in 2015, the Fury’s “came to an agreement” with UKAD in 2017, it took at least 18 months to resolve, which is absolutely unheard of. If he gave a dirty test, was immediately suspended, banned at a hearing all within five months, like literally everybody else, then there would be no dispute. But they allowed Tyson to fight Klitschko several months later, they allowed Hughie to fight up to five more times...after they failed the tests. Literally. Doesn’t. Happen.

          And as I’ve already said in another comment, this bloke coming forward and Glovegate‘s appearance...coincidentally...only occur after Wilder loses lol. It’s just as su****ious as the UKAD debacle.

          Comment


          • #95
            When this story first came out that the Fury’s would use the wild boar meat as the reason for the failed test in court I thought that this was publicly denied and laughed off as the reason they were going to use in court? Maybe I’m misremembering.

            Comment


            • #96
              Originally posted by lilmac99 View Post
              UKAD allowed the drug cheat fury to fight wlad after popping positive for nandrolone. fury is a cheat deal with it.
              Didn't cheat to throughly outbox, outclass and out punch wilder tho did he..

              Comment


              • #97
                Originally posted by Squared.Circle View Post
                The Hammer fight was in 2015, the Fury’s “came to an agreement” with UKAD in 2017, it took at least 18 months to resolve, which is absolutely unheard of. If he gave a dirty test, was immediately suspended, banned at a hearing all within five months, like literally everybody else, then there would be no dispute. But they allowed Tyson to fight Klitschko several months later, they allowed Hughie to fight up to five more times...after they failed the tests. Literally. Doesn’t. Happen.

                And as I’ve already said in another comment, this bloke coming forward and Glovegate‘s appearance...coincidentally...only occur after Wilder loses lol. It’s just as su****ious as the UKAD debacle.
                Because he was innocent until proven guilty, Fury fought the case against him. He claimed he ate wild boar which caused his severely elevated levels of Nandrolone in his body, he also claimed he had mental illness. This were probably the reason why it took long to come to a resolution in that case. Anyways it is done now, he did serve a backdated ban, I guess UKAD didn’t want to be bankrupt as well.

                Comment


                • #98
                  Originally posted by Caught Square View Post
                  When this story first came out that the Fury’s would use the wild boar meat as the reason for the failed test in court I thought that this was publicly denied and laughed off as the reason they were going to use in court? Maybe I’m misremembering.
                  They did use it as the reason, I remember at the time claiming this was a lie. I know some people eat Wild boar but not much in the UK.

                  Comment


                  • #99
                    Originally posted by Squared.Circle View Post
                    Not much of a Fury fan, or else you would have realised the entire UKAD case was dubious from the get go. Find me one single UKAD case where they took two years and millions of pounds to “come to an agreement.” Guarantee you can’t find one.

                    It’s such a coincidence how this farmer, just like the glove conspiracy, has taken the loss of Wilder for them to come to light lol
                    Has no one ever asked why Fury and his cousin suddenly decided to eat uncastrated wild boar? It does sound very dodgy. Its like they Googled to find a way you could fail a drug test by mistake...

                    It reminds me of the time Conor McGregor offered to train Fury and then they had a big chat and Fury hugged him.

                    This guy who has come forward is now incriminating himself so it's hard not to believe him...

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by rudy View Post
                      He still a great champ
                      No, he's a drugs cheat. And only beat an old WK while juiced up to the nines on PEDs.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP